On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Mark Moseley moseleym...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Gary Dusbabek gdusba...@gmail.com wrote:
It is impossible to properly bootstrap a new node into a system where
there are not enough nodes to satisfy the replication factor. The
cluster
Perhaps the better question would be, if I have a two node cluster and
I want to be able to lose one box completely and replace it (without
losing the cluster), what settings would I need? Or is that an
impossible scenario? In production, I'd imagine a 3 node cluster being
the minimum but
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Aaron Morton aa...@thelastpickle.com wrote:
Here's some slides I did last year that have a simple explanation of RF
http://www.slideshare.net/mobile/aaronmorton/well-railedcassandra24112010-5901169
Short version is, generally no single node contains all the
I'm just starting to play with Cassandra, so this is almost certainly
a conceptual problem on my part, so apologies in advance. I was
testing out how I'd do things like bring up new nodes. I've got a
simple 2-node cluster with my only keyspace having
replication_factor=2. This is on 32-bit Debian
It is impossible to properly bootstrap a new node into a system where
there are not enough nodes to satisfy the replication factor. The
cluster as it stands doesn't contain all the data you are asking it to
replicate on the new node.
Gary.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 13:13, Mark Moseley
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Gary Dusbabek gdusba...@gmail.com wrote:
It is impossible to properly bootstrap a new node into a system where
there are not enough nodes to satisfy the replication factor. The
cluster as it stands doesn't contain all the data you are asking it to
replicate on
