-range-for-the-max-number-of-tables-tp7596094p7596119.html
Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive
at Nabble.com.
is it the
accepted practice to have multiple Cassandra installations?
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Reasonable-range-for-the-max-number-of-tables-tp7596094p7596106.html
Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing
.
If you want to be able to segregate customer data in Cassandra is it the
accepted practice to have multiple Cassandra installations?
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Reasonable-range-for-the-max-number-of-tables
but perhaps that's the price we have to pay to scale.
And I still think this needs to be made more prominent in the documentation.
Thanks
Phil
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Reasonable-range-for-the-max-number-of-tables
in this
area.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Phil Luckhurst
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 4:09 AM
To: cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reasonable range for the max number of tables?
Is there any mention of this limitation anywhere in the Cassandra
documentation
customers but perhaps that's the price we have to pay to scale.
And I still think this needs to be made more prominent in the
documentation.
Thanks
Phil
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Reasonable-range-for-the-max-number
What's a reasonable range for the max number of tables? We have an
append-only table system and I've been thinking of moving them to using
hourly / partitioned tables.
This means I can do things like easily drop older tables if I run out of
disk space. It also means that I can fadvise the most
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:
What's a reasonable range for the max number of tables? We have an
append-only table system and I've been thinking of moving them to using
hourly / partitioned tables.
Low Numbers of Hundreds
This means I can do
This means I can do things like easily drop older tables if I run out of
disk space. It also means that I can fadvise the most recent tables and
force them into table cache.
If you have to use fadvise to do this, you are almost certainly Doing It
Wrong.
possibly.. fincore is also useful.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:
What are the bottlenecks here ? Is this an HDD issue because we're
running them on SSD. I agree that that would be significant on HDD ...
Heap consumption. There are probably some JIRA tickets touching on the
memory
apart, with no warning.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Robert Coli
Sent: Monday, August 4, 2014 4:54 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reasonable range for the max number of tables?
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:
What are the bottlenecks here
11 matches
Mail list logo