Re: Removed node is not completely removed

Thanks Sebastian, a restart solved the problem! On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Sebastian Estevez < sebastian.este...@datastax.com> wrote: > We still keep endpoints in memory. Not sure how you git to this state but > try a rolling restart. > On Oct 14, 2015 9:43 AM, "Tom van den Berge"

Re: Removed node is not completely removed

Check system.peers table to see if the IP is still there. If so edit the table and remove the offending IP. You are probably running into this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6053 Regards, Carlos Juzarte Rolo Cassandra Consultant Pythian - Love your data rolo@pythian |

Re: Removed node is not completely removed

Remember that the system keyspace uses LocalStrategy: each node has its own set of system tables. -ml On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Tom van den Berge < tom.vandenbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > I'm using 2.1.6. The mysterious node is not in the peers table. Any other > ideas? > One

Re: Removed node is not completely removed

Thanks for that Michael, I did not know that. However, the node is not listed in the system.peers table on any node, so it seems that the problem is not in this table. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Laing, Michael wrote: > Remember that the system keyspace uses

Re: Removed node is not completely removed

We still keep endpoints in memory. Not sure how you git to this state but try a rolling restart. On Oct 14, 2015 9:43 AM, "Tom van den Berge" wrote: > Thanks for that Michael, I did not know that. However, the node is not > listed in the system.peers table on any node,

Re: Removed node is not completely removed

Hi Carlos, I'm using 2.1.6. The mysterious node is not in the peers table. Any other ideas? One of my existing nodes is not present in the system.peers table, though. Should I be worried? Regards, Tom On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Carlos Rolo wrote: > Check system.peers