On 2017-06-16 10:31 (-0700), John Hughes wrote:
> Hi Affan,
>
> Others can likely speak to this more authoritatively I am sure, but with a
> RF of 1x, I would not expect it to rebalance. Now if you were 4 nodes and a
> RF of 2x I would expect it to.
>
Even with an RF
what you are experiencing can be cleared up by
>>>>> repair/compaction/cleanup. Also, what are your outputs when you call out
>>>>> specific keyspaces? Do the numbers get more even?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>>
c9 1c
>>>>>>> UN XX.XX.XX.XX 17.17 GiB 256 51.3%
>>>>>>> d2a65c51-087d-48de-ae1f-a41142eb148d 1b
>>>>>>> UN XX.XX.XX.XX 26.15 GiB 256 52.4%
>>>>>>> acf5dd34-5b81
t; 6c8842dd-a966-467c-a7bc-bd6269ce3e7e 1a
>>>>>> UN XX.XX.XX.XX 24.39 GiB 256 49.8%
>>>>>> fd92525d-edf2-4974-8bc5-a350a8831dfa 1a
>>>>>> UN XX.XX.XX.XX 23.8 GiB 256 48.7%
>>>>>> bdc597c0-718c-4ef6-b3ef-7785110a99
;> UN XX.XX.XX.XX 23.8 GiB 256 48.7%
>>>>> bdc597c0-718c-4ef6-b3ef-7785110a9923 1b
>>>>>
>>>>> Though maybe part of what you are experiencing can be cleared up by
>>>>> repair/compaction/cleanup. Also, what are your outputs when you call out
>>
;> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:22 AM Akhil Mehra <akhilme...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> auto_bootstrap is true by default. Ensure its set to true. On startup
>>>>> look at your logs for your auto_bootstrap value. Look at the node
Look at the node
>>>> configuration line in your log file.
>>>>
>>>> Akhil
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Junaid Nasir <jna...@an10.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, I didn't set it (left it at default
>
>>>>> Did you make sure auto_bootstrap property is indeed set to [true]
>>>>> when you added the node?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Junaid Nasir [mailto:jna...@an10.io]
>>>>> *Sent:* Mon
AD A <az1...@att.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Did you make sure auto_bootstrap property is indeed set to [true] when
>>>> you added the node?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Junaid Nasir [mailto:jna...@an10.io]
>>>&
gt;>> *From:* Junaid Nasir [mailto:jna...@an10.io]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 05, 2017 6:29 AM
>>> *To:* Akhil Mehra <akhilme...@gmail.com>
>>> *Cc:* Vladimir Yudovin <vla...@winguzone.com>; user@cassandra.apache.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: Convert single
gt;> *Sent:* Monday, June 05, 2017 6:29 AM
>> *To:* Akhil Mehra <akhilme...@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* Vladimir Yudovin <vla...@winguzone.com>; user@cassandra.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Convert single node C* to cluster (rebalancing problem)
>>
>>
>>
>>
ent:* Monday, June 05, 2017 6:29 AM
> *To:* Akhil Mehra <akhilme...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Vladimir Yudovin <vla...@winguzone.com>; user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Convert single node C* to cluster (rebalancing problem)
>
>
>
> not evenly, i have s
Subject: Re: Convert single node C* to cluster (rebalancing problem)
not evenly, i have setup a new cluster with subset of data (around 5gb). using
the configuration above I am getting these results
Datacenter: datacenter1
===
Status=Up/Down
|/ State=Normal/Leaving/Jo
not evenly, i have setup a new cluster with subset of data (around 5gb).
using the configuration above I am getting these results
Datacenter: datacenter1
===
Status=Up/Down
|/ State=Normal/Leaving/Joining/Moving
-- Address Load Tokens Owns (effective) Host
So now the data is evenly balanced in both nodes?
Refer to the following documentation to get a better understanding of the
roc_address and the broadcast_rpc_address
https://www.instaclustr.com/demystifying-cassandras-broadcast_address/
I am able to get it working. I added a new node with following changes
#rpc_address:0.0.0.0
rpc_address: 10.128.1.11
#rpc_broadcast_address:10.128.1.11
rpc_address was set to 0.0.0.0, (I ran into a problem previously regarding
remote connection and made these changes
Did you run "nodetool cleanup" on first node after second was bootstrapped? It
should clean rows not belonging to node after tokens changed.
Best regards, Vladimir Yudovin,
Winguzone - Cloud Cassandra Hosting
On Wed, 31 May 2017 03:55:54 -0400 Junaid Nasir jna...@an10.io
wrote
When you bootstrapped the node for the first time did you see log similar to
the following:
INFO [main] 2017-06-01 07:19:45,199 StorageService.java:1435 - JOINING:
waiting for schema information to complete
INFO [main] 2017-06-01 07:19:45,250 StorageService.java:1435 - JOINING: schema
sorry that was an old notetool status output (old cluster with a few
configuration changes). new configuration is
-- Address Load Tokens Owns (effective) Host ID
Rack
UN 10.128.1.2 270.75 GiB 256 52.6%
e4427611-c247-42ee-9404-371e177f5f17
Hi Junaid,
I noticed in the log files that data is being streamed from/to 10.128.1.2 but
the address of your original node is 10.128.0.7.
Are there any other Cassandra nodes on your local network the same cluster
name.
Regards,
Akhil
> 10.128.1.2
> On 31/05/2017, at 10:15 PM, Junaid Nasir
after nodetool repair on new node following log appears in cassandra log
INFO [StreamConnectionEstablisher:1] 2017-05-31 10:07:23,496
> StreamSession.java:266 - [Stream #f0eb9670-45e8-11e7-a17b-81e9a18c6eac]
> Starting streaming to /10.128.1.2
> INFO [StreamConnectionEstablisher:1] 2017-05-31
Cassandra version is 3.10, and yes its not a production server. i have seen
some warnings in logs saying token exist on both servers. other than that
nothing. if you need any more settings/details please ask. thank you for
your time
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Oleksandr Shulgin <
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Junaid Nasir wrote:
> Cassandra ensure that adding or removing nodes are very easy and that load
> is balanced between nodes when a change is made. but it's not working in my
> case.
> I have a single node C* deployment (with 270 GB of data) and
Cassandra ensure that adding or removing nodes are very easy and that load
is balanced between nodes when a change is made. but it's not working in my
case.
I have a single node C* deployment (with 270 GB of data) and want to load
balance the data on multiple nodes, I followed this guide
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:
So , shouldn't it be easy to rebalance a cluster?
I'm not super excited to type out 200 commands to move around individual
tokens.
That's why vnodes exist? Before vnodes, the only sane option was to double
your cluster
So , shouldn't it be easy to rebalance a cluster?
I'm not super excited to type out 200 commands to move around individual
tokens.
I realize that this isn't a super easy solution, and that there are
probably 2-3 different algorithms to pick here… but having this be the only
option doesn't seem
You don't need to specify tokens. The new node gets them automatically.
On Jul 22, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:
So , shouldn't it be easy to rebalance a cluster?
I'm not super excited to type out 200 commands to move around individual
tokens.
I realize
ok.. I think I get what's happening. This node is still joining the
cluster.
It wasn't totally clear that it was still joining as the only indicator is
the little J ...
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jonathan Haddad jonathan.had...@gmail.com
wrote:
You don't need to specify tokens. The new
28 matches
Mail list logo