Sorry about the website, I plan on fixing it with the 1.0 release.
UserComment is one of the uglier cases, as it uses that GPS string
type with a special prefix to distinguish character encodings.
Try using TagInfo.Text's encodeValue() method to convert the String to
byte[], then pass that to
Hi,
I am trying to run a piece of java code that uses apache commons net
library to connect to a folder and download some files as a service. The
service is installed ok and runs but hangs at the part where it has to
connect to a ftp server, no error, no timeouts, just goes silent.
Cheers,
On 03/08/2012 12:25 PM, Ahsan Ikram wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to run a piece of java code that uses apache commons net library to
connect to a folder and download some files as a service.
Since you are speaking about 'folder' I presume this is
on windows, right?
The service is installed ok
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Kasper Føns kfo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry about the website, I plan on fixing it with the 1.0 release.
UserComment is one of the uglier cases, as it uses that GPS string
type with a special prefix to distinguish character encodings.
Try using TagInfo.Text's
I wouldn't count on Windows Explorer to give you the right values.
Rather check it against exiftool
(www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/):
exiftool -a -g1 -u image.tiff
Windows Explorer also likes the XP values (eg. EXIF_TAG_XPCOMMENT,
EXIF_TAG_XPAUTHOR), maybe try writing those as well?
Windows Explorer also likes the XP values (eg. EXIF_TAG_XPCOMMENT,
EXIF_TAG_XPAUTHOR), maybe try writing those as well?
Hmm. You seem to be right that explorer likes the XP values. However, I
can't figure out how to write to them. I can see that they are BYTE
values, but how to convert a
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Kasper Føns kfo...@gmail.com wrote:
Windows Explorer also likes the XP values (eg. EXIF_TAG_XPCOMMENT,
EXIF_TAG_XPAUTHOR), maybe try writing those as well?
Hmm. You seem to be right that explorer likes the XP values. However, I
can't figure out how to write to
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Kasper Føns kfo...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't count on Windows Explorer to give you the right values.
Rather check it against exiftool
(www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/):
exiftool -a -g1 -u image.tiff
Windows Explorer also likes the XP values (eg.
On 8 March 2012 06:38, manoj mokashi manojmoka...@gmail.com wrote:
@James :
Does the header include a record size ?
Yes. I suppose you are wondering why i need to detect the headers if
the record size is known.
Actually its a corrupted archive in which the header size is correct,
but the body
