should have been clearer in the documentation.
Do let me know if you think there’s a way to better present this details.
Many thanks and all the best,
-Rob
> On Mar 31, 2017, at 7:16 AM, Sébastien Piller <m...@sebpiller.ch> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> If I call
> new LongestCommo
Hi all,
If I call
new LongestCommonSubsequence ().apply ("xxx","yyy")
I get 0 (correct)
If I call
new LongestCommonSubsequence ().apply ("Gandalf","Sauron")
I get 2 which looks incorrect to me (should have got 1 since there is no
sequence of 2 chars on both strings. Is it a bug or an expected
t : Re: [text] Longest common subsequence wrong
result?
Sébastien Piller wrote:
> Hi all,
> If I call
> new LongestCommonSubsequence ().apply ("xxx","yyy")
> I get 0 (correct)
> If I call
> new LongestCommonSubsequence ().apply ("Gandalf",&q
