Hey Guys,
Has the drools3 schema been designed so that it cannot be extended? If
so why?
I would like to extend some of the complex types from my schema. This is
part of a dynamic test harness that I am writing for drools. I've logged
it in Jira.
Anyhow the xsd has definitions like:
Hi Paul,
in what framework are you using drools? I am using a struts plugin validator
which accesses a set of validation rules stored in my drl. This works very
nicely as it leaves the grunt work to the struts validator, ie. collecting the
errors and displaying them appropriately.
beans are very lightweight as they are strictly
concerned with persistence and not logic.
4. Put some WSDL on the front and have .Net, J2EE, Delphi access it
and it all behaves the same way.
On 1/31/06, Matthew Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul,
in what framework are you using drools? I am
Hi guys,
can anyone think of any issues that my arise if using log4j in the drl fle. I
am passing it in as application data from my session facade bean.
Cheers,
Matt.
Matt Shaw
Snr Applications Developer
Service Performance Management Unit
Phone: 3247 8666. ext. 94666
This correspondence
