Re: EJB ejb.manifest.classpath

In the mail, the second point, that you mentioned about META_INF\manifest.mf is the correct one. If we have ejb.manifest.classpath =true we nee to add in the Manifest.mf file. After sending the mail, i have checked one thing that why cant we add in the same way under J2EE module

Re: EJB ejb.manifest.classpath

Thats true, except in case of standalone clients where you need to add manfest entry. Thanks Rakesh On 2/19/07, Hari Krishna Korrapati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the mail, the second point, that you mentioned about META_INF\manifest.mf is the correct one. If we have

virtual host

hello, how could i declare a virtualhost in config.xml on a particular port (ie 8082) ? it seems there's no attribute to declare the port. thanks regards, jack - Any questions? Get answers on any topic at Yahoo! Answers. Try it now.

Action instance creation failure in geronimo 1.1.1 - Reg

Hi, We are using Geronimo 1.1.1. Our application uses struts. Every action file will be invoke from a file called SecurityFilter.java which implements Filter. But in some of the instances action file is not invoked. Including the logs when successfully invoking the action file and when

javax.mail.NoSuchProviderException when Trying to send mail using Geronimo 1.1.1 - Reg

Hi , Iam using Geronimo 1.1.1 .Can any one help me in resolving the following issue, iam trying to configure a mail session and send notification mail. But when I try to run my application it throws this particular error. Iam not able to figure out what it suggests, Your valuable suggestion is

Re: javax.mail.NoSuchProviderException when Trying to send mail usingGeronimo 1.1.1 - Reg

This looks like it should be correct. However, I'm puzzled by the stacktrace you included in your original email. From that trace, it doesn't look like your mailing code is running under geronimo. How are you invoking that code? Rick Kamalanathan Raman wrote: Thanks Rick for replying .

Re: Action instance creation failure in geronimo 1.1.1 - Reg

On Feb 19, 2007, at 8:14 AM, Kamalanathan Raman wrote: Hi, We are using Geronimo 1.1.1. Our application uses struts. Every action file will be invoke from a file called “SecurityFilter.java” which implements Filter. But in some of the instances action file is not invoked. Including

RE: Action instance creation failure in geronimo 1.1.1 - Reg

Hi, Thanks Kevan for replying Our J2EE application uses struts. We are using filter before invoking every action (*.do). So, every action file will be invoked from Security Filter which implements Filter interface. Our problem is Security filter is not invoking in some of the instances

Re: Action instance creation failure in geronimo 1.1.1 - Reg

On Feb 19, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Kamalanathan Raman wrote: Hi, Thanks Kevan for replying Our J2EE application uses struts. We are using filter before invoking every action (*.do). So, every action file will be invoked from “Security Filter” which implements Filter interface. Our problem

Re: virtual host

Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What container are you using? Here are two docs for Geronimo v1.2 that might help a bit. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/configuring-virtual-hosts-in-geronimo-jetty.html

Message-Driven Beans with run-as Subject

Hi, One Geronimo 1.2-beta, I'm running into a problem where a message-driven bean that I have is unable to access a stateless session EJB that I have, due to method permission restrictions. This MDB is configured with a run-as subject in the ejb-jar.xml which is supposed to allow it to access

Re: virtual host

the only workaround I found was to declare a new web connector and specify the port you want the application to listen on. then I configured the VH as desc in the http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/configuring-virtual-hosts-in-geronimo-tomcat.html doc. the down side of this workaround is that

Re: Message-Driven Beans with run-as Subject

It looks to me as if the mdb interceptor stack is missing the EJBRunAsInterceptor which would mean that run-as wouldn't work. I'm also not seeing how any Subject such as the default subject is set for an mdb call. So I think there's a bug (would rather check the spec to make sure it's

Re: virtual host

Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is another sample for exposing apps on different ports http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/exposing-web-applications-on-distinct-ports.html thanks. it's exactly what i'm looking for. not trivial to setup. both solutions works for me with geronimo

Re: Need your suggestions...

On Feb 18, 2007, at 1:34 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Feb 18, 2007, at 9:32 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: On Feb 10, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Hari Krishna Korrapati wrote: Hi Experts, We have list of J2EE application (components Servlets,JSP,Struts,EJB,Hibernate) currently running on Websphere

Re: Message-Driven Beans with run-as Subject

I checked out the MDB interceptor stack and I do see that the EjbRunAsInterceptor is missing. In order for me to add it and test it out, I'd need to rebuild the openejb-2.2 project. I have this checked out but am having difficulty building it. Is there an article out there for building