It appears you're accessing an SMTP server that doesn't send a reply
back from a QUIT message. This is the first one of these I've encountered.
The good news is there's a session property you can configure to change
whether the SMTPTransport waits for a response from a QUIT command. The
bad
Thanks Rick for replying .. should i modify something in
geronimo-appliication.xml where iam using the gbean to configure mail session
See the gbean that i have given below.
gbean name=mail/MailSession
class=org.apache.geronimo.mail.MailGBean
attribute
Hi Rick,
Please help me in resolving this problem. Iam using geronimo 1.1.1 , iam
clueless about this error.
javax.mail.internet.ParseException: Missing ''
at
javax.mail.internet.HeaderTokenizer.readQuotedString(HeaderTokenizer.java:270)
at
Ok, the answer to this one depends on how you are getting a javamail
Session object to do the send. If you are getting the Session by doing a
JNDI lookup for mail/MailResource, then just add
mail.smtp.quitwait=false to the property attributes you have below.
However, if you are creating the
I've not seen an error in this area before, and I'm not sure I can
figure it out just from the stack trace. If you create a simple program
that can recreate the problem, I should be able to debug. Alternatively,
I could send you a specially built version of javamail code that will
emit some
Please can u send that specially built version of javamail code to edit some
debugging information...thanks a lot for replying rick...
kamal
- Original Message
From: Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 7 March, 2007 6:20:04 PM
Subject:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to configure an ActiveMQ JMS message bridge. In order
to do this, I had to recompile Geronimo 1.2 so that it would pick up its
ActiveMQ broker configuration from an external XBean configuration file. I
also deploy an EAR to Geronimo that consists of our application.
I don't know how likely it is to work, but what happens if you define
the admin objects in both the xbean activemq plan (so your message
bridge can work) and also in your ear (so geronimo believes they
exist)? I have the rather unsubstantiated impression that AMQ thinks
a topic or queue
I tried what you have suggested, and it did fix the deploy issue, but it
seems like two separate topics get created with the same name. The message
bridge listens on the first topic that is defined, and the EAR references
the second topic that is defined.
David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
