Thanks, Andrew.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
You will also need the below site properties for the HBase client / shell.
They toggle on secure UGI and select the correct RPC engine.
property
namehbase.security.authentication/name
I am using Hbase 0.94.9
Best Regards,
Job M Thomas
From: Job Thomas [mailto:j...@suntecgroup.com]
Sent: Wed 9/4/2013 11:08 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException: -1 in hbase
Hi All,
I am getting the following
Hi Tom,
Below parameters may help to reduce the compaction number:
property
namehbase.hstore.compactionThreshold/name
value3/value
description
If more than this number of HStoreFiles in any one HStore
(one HStoreFile is written per flush of memstore) then a compaction
is
Search the reagion name in regionserver logs, if there are starting compaction
messages but no matched finishing messages, the region is compacting.
Frank Chow
From: Sandeep L
Date: 2013-09-04 13:32
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Check if a region is compacting or not
Hi,
I would like
Is it normal to receive 3-5 distinct Compaction Complete statuses for the
same region each second? For any individual region, it continuously
generates Compacting d in {theregion}... Compaction Complete statuses for
minutes or hours.
In that status message, what is d?
--Tom
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013
Here d should be the column family being compacted.
Do you have 3-5 column families of the same region being compacted?
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Tom Brown tombrow...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it normal to receive 3-5 distinct Compaction Complete statuses for the
same region each second? For
I should also explicitly state that we (Salesforce) will stay with 0.94 for the
foreseeable future.
We will continue backport fixes that we need. If those are not acceptable or
accepted into the open source 0.94 branch, they will have to go into an
Salesforce internal repository.
I would
It's open source. My personal point of view is that if someone is willing
to spend time on the backport, there should be no issue, if the regression
risk is clearly acceptable the rolling restart possible. If it's
necessary (i.e. there is no agreement of the risk level), then we could as
well go
No, just one column family (called d, not surprisingly).
--Tom
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Jimmy Xiang jxi...@cloudera.com wrote:
Here d should be the column family being compacted.
Do you have 3-5 column families of the same region being compacted?
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Tom
+1 to what Nicolas said.
That goes for Phoenix as well. It's open source too. We do plan to port to
0.96 when our user community (Salesforce.com, of course, being one of them)
demands it.
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Nicolas Liochon nkey...@gmail.com wrote:
It's open
This maybe a newbie or dumb question but I believe, this does not affect or
apply to HBase distributions by other vendors like HortonWorks or Cloudera.
If someone is using one of the versions of distributions provided by them
then it is up to them (and not people and community here) what and till
It's a very good point. Most people will go to 0.96 when CDH and
Hortonworks support it.
On 9/4/13 2:55 PM, Shahab Yunus shahab.yu...@gmail.com wrote:
This maybe a newbie or dumb question but I believe, this does not affect
or
apply to HBase distributions by other vendors like HortonWorks
If LarsH is willing to stay on as RM for 0.94 then IMHO we should proceed
as today with the exception that 0.96 is what the stable symlink points to.
As long as 0.94 has someone willing to RM and users such as Salesforce then
there will be individuals there and in the community motivated to keep
Anil:
You having GC'ing issues Anil? You hitting Full GCs pretty regularly?
(Setting up a jenkins build as Lars suggests or having us add a note to the
website somewhere saying 0.94 runs on jdk7 -- presuming it passes a couple
of jenkins builds -- would be no problem... just say what you need).
We, at Pinterest, are also going to stay on 0.94 for a while since it has
worked well for us and we don't have the resources to test 0.96 in the EC2
environment. That may change in the future but we don't know when...
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
If
As long as there is interest for 0.94, we will care for 0.94. However, when
0.96.0 comes out, it will be marked as the next stable release, so I expect
that we would promote newcomers that branch.
Any committer can propose any branch and release candidate any time, so if
there are road blocks for
@Stack: Inline
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Anil:
You having GC'ing issues Anil? You hitting Full GCs pretty regularly?
While testing my cluster, i did a full table scan on a table having 600
million records(at that time very few writes were going on). I was
@Andrew: Inline
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
I've been testing high loads with HBase 0.94 and JDK 7 for a while, .17 and
.25, with no observed issues. This is on the EC2 HVM instance types.
On running with large heaps, your mileage will vary
Dear All,
For the below 1 to many relationship column sets, require suggestion on how
to design a Flatten HBase table... Kindly refer the attached image for the
scenario...
Pls let me know if my scenario is not clearly explained...
regards,
Rams
Just to add more information , i got following link which explains metrics
related to RS.
http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#rs_metrics
Is there any resource which explains these metrics in detail ,( in official
guide , there is just one line for each metric) .
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:06 AM,
20 matches
Mail list logo
