akkirisamy <
> kirupakkiris...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "d...@hbase.apache.org"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 12:31 AM
> Subject: Re: HBase - stable versions
>
>
> That's linux terminology. 0.95 is a developper release It should not go in
> production. When
Nicolas, makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
Regards,
- kiru
From: Nicolas Liochon
To: user ; Kiru Pakkirisamy
Cc: "d...@hbase.apache.org"
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: HBase - stable versions
That's li
gt;
>
> Regards,
> - kiru
>
>
>
> From: Ameya Kanitkar
> To: user@hbase.apache.org; Kiru Pakkirisamy
> Cc: "d...@hbase.apache.org"
> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 5:02 PM
> Subject: Re: HBase - stable versions
>
>
> We (Groupon), will also stick
great).
Regards,
- kiru
From: Ameya Kanitkar
To: user@hbase.apache.org; Kiru Pakkirisamy
Cc: "d...@hbase.apache.org"
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: HBase - stable versions
We (Groupon), will also stick to 0.94 for near futu
gards,
> - kiru
>
>
> From: Enis Söztutar
> To: hbase-user
> Cc: "d...@hbase.apache.org"
> Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 6:20 PM
> Subject: Re: HBase - stable versions
>
>
> As long as there is interest for 0.94, we will care for 0.94.
13 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: HBase - stable versions
As long as there is interest for 0.94, we will care for 0.94. However, when
0.96.0 comes out, it will be marked as the next stable release, so I expect
that we would promote newcomers that branch.
Any committer can propose any branch and release can
As long as there is interest for 0.94, we will care for 0.94. However, when
0.96.0 comes out, it will be marked as the next stable release, so I expect
that we would promote newcomers that branch.
Any committer can propose any branch and release candidate any time, so if
there are road blocks for
We, at Pinterest, are also going to stay on 0.94 for a while since it has
worked well for us and we don't have the resources to test 0.96 in the EC2
environment. That may change in the future but we don't know when...
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> If LarsH is willing t
If LarsH is willing to stay on as RM for 0.94 then IMHO we should proceed
as today with the exception that 0.96 is what the stable symlink points to.
As long as 0.94 has someone willing to RM and users such as Salesforce then
there will be individuals there and in the community motivated to keep i
i.e. we keep making changes in 0.94.x,
>>and
>> > > declare (say) 0.94.12 stable and have 0.94.12.1, etc, releases (much
>> like
>> > > what is done in Linux)
>> > >
>> > > We also currently have no resources to port Phoenix ove
> like
> > > what is done in Linux)
> > >
> > > We also currently have no resources to port Phoenix over to 0.96 (but
> if
> > > somebody wanted to step up, that would be greatly appreciated, of
> > course).
> > >
> > > Thoughts? Comments?
is done in Linux)
> >
> > We also currently have no resources to port Phoenix over to 0.96 (but if
> > somebody wanted to step up, that would be greatly appreciated, of
> course).
> >
> > Thoughts? Comments? Concerns?
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
>
.96 (but if
> somebody wanted to step up, that would be greatly appreciated, of course).
>
> Thoughts? Comments? Concerns?
>
> -- Lars
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: lars hofhansl
> To: hbase-dev ; hbase-user
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 201
(but if
somebody wanted to step up, that would be greatly appreciated, of course).
Thoughts? Comments? Concerns?
-- Lars
- Original Message -
From: lars hofhansl
To: hbase-dev ; hbase-user
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 5:30 PM
Subject: HBase - stable versions
With 0.96 being
We are using 0.94 and at present we are satisfied with it.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> Thanks for starting the discussion.
>
> My 2¢:
> I think we should keep 0.94 going for at least few minor releases. To apply
> big fixes and performances fixes. H
Hi Lars,
Thanks for starting the discussion.
My 2¢:
I think we should keep 0.94 going for at least few minor releases. To apply
big fixes and performances fixes. However, new features should only go into
0.96 and should now not be backported anymore. That way we can keep 0,94
stable, but we can a
With 0.96 being imminent we should start a discussion about continuing support
for 0.94.
0.92 became stale pretty soon after 0.94 was released.
The relationship between 0.94 and 0.96 is slightly different, though:
1. 0.92.x could be upgraded to 0.94.x without downtime
2. 0.92 clients and servers
17 matches
Mail list logo
