Re: [jbehave-user] Filtering works not as expected with a scenario containing an examples table

2014-05-20 Thread Mauro Talevi
So, what's the consensus then with the keywords? On 16/05/2014 18:42, Mauro Talevi wrote: I'll defer to whatever you guys decide is best. We can always change it later. On 15/05/2014 18:27, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: Hans, I am not sure I agree :-). JEDES would be EVERY IMO. According to

Re: [jbehave-user] JBehave Preferences

2014-05-20 Thread Mauro Talevi
It's a design philosophy ... with its pros and cons. The risk of creating a uber class is that you loose touch of what configuration is relevant to what component. But in fact, the Configuration class allows you access to all the different bits, the Controls, the Builders etc ... so that

Re: [jbehave-user] JBehave Preferences

2014-05-20 Thread Hans Schwäbli
I see, no problem. That can be also solved with documentation specifical on what can be configured and what the defaults are I think. The default values could be also documented in Javadoc (I know, I don't use that very much too). On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Mauro Talevi