Hello,
I followed Ofbiz install instruction in http://build.ofbiz.org/ . So, I
downloaded ofbiz-trunk-current.zip, and executed startofbiz in terminal. It
was in 23 day in the morning. Now is 29 day and it still proceeds
installation process... So it is installing 6 days and hadn't finished yet.
Hello Ravi,
Attach your changes as a patch, if it is small. Hopefully this is allowed
in the group.
Or, paste the contents of each file at the end of the email, so that other
will have a chance to review and find out easily.
Or start from scratch using Practice application as the base.
What kind of hardware are you running this on?
I've heard of long build/install/run times on Windows because of the
synchronous IO, but usually on Linux it's not too bad. On my tiny
laptop it takes about 30 minutes on Windows and about 5 minutes on
Linux to do an ant run-install from
Sorry to bring back this old user thread on dev ML, but I think we should defintively made this configurable. At least to allow
people to easily
try 2 basic configurations (ie -1 or 60) and especially to make people
aware of possible problems there.
The related doc is here
You may also switch the DB to PostGres to speed up things dramatically
Jacques
From: David E Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com
What kind of hardware are you running this on?
I've heard of long build/install/run times on Windows because of the
synchronous IO, but usually on Linux it's not
Hello,
How do I replay to certain user message that is in email in the list ? For
example, replay to Java Events:
...
Re: BUILD FAILED while adding new component
22105 by: shuchi
22106 by: BJ Freeman
22109 by: Ashish Vijaywargiya
Java Events
22107 by:
Those log entries are just scheduled services running, my guess is
that OFBiz isn't installing it's just up and running.
Regards
Scott
On 29/05/2009, at 7:01 PM, Gintare Ragaisiene wrote:
Hello,
I followed Ofbiz install instruction in http://build.ofbiz.org/ .
So, I
downloaded
Here is the nabble area where all the mailing list(User, Dev Commits) are
maintained.
Here you can reply to the original email (for this you may need to subscribe
at nabble).
After replying you will get the message in your mailbox if you are
subscribed on any of the respective mailing list.
Then
Oops missed the link in previous email.
Here you go.
http://www.nabble.com/OFBiz-f2740.html
--
Ashish
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya
vijaywargiya.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the nabble area where all the mailing list(User, Dev Commits) are
maintained.
Here you can
Hello David,
Would me more then happy to know your thoughts about such a big time
consumed on Windows machine?
I have the same experience with Windows box.
Thanks in advance.
--
Ashish
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:46 PM, David E Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
What kind of hardware
Isn't it funny Scott ? ;o)
--
Ashish
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote:
Do you mean reply? Umm, just click on Reply in your email client?
Regards
Scott
My guess is because Windows uses synchronous IO and Linux uses
asynchronous IO. I'm no Windows expert so I don't know for sure, or if
there is a way to improve performance on Windows.
Chances are by paying money for Windows Server or some sort of third-
party commercial add-on the problem
I guess Derby relies more on the File System when creating tables, indexex, etc. And we all know that the Windows File System (NTFS)
is not its strong point
If you use PostGres (also I use it on another disk than were OFBiz run), running run-install on a new DB is only a matter of minutes
on a
Hi Ravi,
Here are some rules or say patterns which are common for defining any
entity.
- Entity name must be in UpperCamelCase.
- If entity name is abbreviation like Unit Od Measure (UOM) then treat
it as one word and name is like Uom.
- The Field name must be in lowerCamelCase and
Hi,startofbiz.sh is for starting the server after the installation.
Follow the README file in ofbiz folder for the installation steps.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Gintare Ragaisiene
gintare.ragaisi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I followed Ofbiz install instruction in
Thanks
ya
Dňa Št, 2009-05-28 o 14:11 +0200, Jacques Le Roux napísal:
There is already a such example OOTB : the line
group-map group-name=org.ofbiz.olap datasource-name=localderbyolap/
in entityEngine.xml shows you the way
Jacques
From: Ján Valkovic yan...@samsonzv.sk
Hi,
is
The first time I ran OFBIZ I thought it was compiling when it was really
running and outputting to the console.
You can redirect the output from the console or just us the entry in
startofbiz.sh, it is the next to the last line.
Uncomment it and comment the last line.
# start OFBiz
$JAVA $VMARGS
windows, as such, is bloated. Most computer come with 512 of memory, but
that is not even enough to load the core OS.
Then there is all the apps that someone loads, so the machine is using
the virtual disk drive which is a hard disk file, Usually this file is
scattered all over the disk, because
if you need the orginal email you can do two things
1) you can ask the mailing list server to send you those numbers. so you
can then reply. Since you have those numbers I assume you have the
instructions on how to retrieve them. if not send a email to
user-h...@ofbiz.apache.org you will get back
Thanks Rishi,
I don't know if there is already a such description in wiki, if not we may add
it in Contributor Best Practices...
Jacques
From: Rishi Solanki rishisolan...@gmail.com
Hi Ravi,
Here are some rules or say patterns which are common for defining any
entity.
- Entity name must be
Thanks Rishi :)
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Rishi Solanki rishisolan...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Ravi,
Here are some rules or say patterns which are common for defining any
entity.
- Entity name must be in UpperCamelCase.
- If entity name is abbreviation like Unit Od Measure (UOM)
I run OFBiz on a number of Windows XP boxes and I don't have any
performance problems. Running ant run-install on a fresh checkout takes
3 minutes.
-Adrian
Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Hello David,
Would me more then happy to know your thoughts about such a big time
consumed on Windows
Begin to look like a troll :D
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
I run OFBiz on a number of Windows XP boxes and I don't have any
performance problems. Running ant run-install on a fresh checkout takes
3 minutes.
-Adrian
Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Hello David,
Would me more
It normally only takes about 0.003 days to install.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Dan Dodd dand...@ihop.org wrote:
The first time I ran OFBIZ I thought it was compiling when it was really
running and outputting to the console.
You can redirect the output from the console or just us the
I have a screencap if anyone doesn't believe me. ;-)
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Begin to look like a troll :D
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
I run OFBiz on a number of Windows XP boxes and I don't have any
performance problems. Running ant run-install on a fresh checkout
I am still wondering...the question
is it INSTALLING OFBiz??
or..
is it RUNNING startofbiz.sh ??
-- startofbiz.sh can be background loading.../daemon...
Charles Tj
Hello,
I followed Ofbiz install instruction in http://build.ofbiz.org/ . So, I
downloaded
Hi,
I think there is a bug in the Lookup orders page. If you deselect all the
status and click on Find, you have this message :
Error on line 167, column 13 in
component://order/webapp/ordermgr/order/orderlist.ftl
orderHeader.getRelatedOneCache(StatusItem) is undefined. It cannot be
assigned to
Hi,
There is a bug in the Lookup Order(s) screen. If you change nothing
and click on Find, you see the samples orders, but if you unselect all
types, you have the following message :
You do not have permission to view this page (it needs ORDERMGR_VIEW
or ORDERMGR_ADMIN).
And I was connected
You mean 3 mins OOTB, with Derby ? What kind of XP boxes have you ? Mine is
almost 15 mins, 3 mins with PostGres
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
I have a screencap if anyone doesn't believe me. ;-)
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Begin to look like a troll :D
Jacques
From:
Hi,
There is a bug in the Eclipse files of the
ofbiz-rel9.04-2009-05-28-v779496 version :
Project 'ofbiz' is missing required library:
'framework/webapp/lib/barcode4j-fop-ext-0.93.jar'
Cimballi
Hi,
There is another bug in the Lookup Order(s) screen.
If you select one or more status and Sales type, the result display
only the Sales Orders.
But if you select no status and Sales type, the result display all
orders (at least, with Demo data, it displays also the Purchase
Order).
Cimballi
if you have not updated in the last few weeks then do so
if you have updated
besure to
ant clean
and build
Cimballi sent the following on 5/29/2009 11:14 AM:
Hi,
There is a bug in the Eclipse files of the
ofbiz-rel9.04-2009-05-28-v779496 version :
Project 'ofbiz' is missing required
I give more precision about this bug.
In fact, I added samples data in a XML data file and imported it.
In my order, there was no status and no orderDate, but the import worked well.
And then, in the application, if an order has no status or no
orderDate (and maybe other fields), the lookup
have you been able to duplicate this on the demo904 server?
Cimballi sent the following on 5/29/2009 11:41 AM:
Hi,
There is another bug in the Lookup Order(s) screen.
If you select one or more status and Sales type, the result display
only the Sales Orders.
But if you select no status and
Yes...
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:44 PM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
have you been able to duplicate this on the demo904 server?
Cimballi sent the following on 5/29/2009 11:41 AM:
Hi,
There is another bug in the Lookup Order(s) screen.
If you select one or more status and Sales
hopefully some one will have time to look at it soon.
:D
Cimballi sent the following on 5/29/2009 11:51 AM:
Yes...
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:44 PM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
have you been able to duplicate this on the demo904 server?
Cimballi sent the following on 5/29/2009
If a I pass a social security number, it doesn't bring any thing, however
searching by name works:
entity-condition list=parties entity-name=Person
condition-list combine=and
condition-list combine=or
condition-expr field-name=firstName
Maybe your first condition-list element should be:
condition-list combine=or
-Adrian
--- On Fri, 5/29/09, Muhammad Aamir m...@aamir.pk wrote:
From: Muhammad Aamir m...@aamir.pk
Subject: entity-condition question
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 2:19 PM
If a I pass a
Hi,
There is a graphical bug in the screen
https://demo904.ofbiz.org/catalog/control/EditCategoryProducts?productCategoryId=SERV-001
The Edit Category Products title is really really big.
Cimballi
Hi,
There are several inconsistancies in the file
applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/order/OrderView.groovy.
I didn't note all of them, but here is an example :
Line 260, productStore can be null :
productStore = orderHeader.getRelatedOne(ProductStore);
if (productStore)
What is the bug? What was the expected behavior and what was the actual result?
-Adrian
--- On Fri, 5/29/09, Cimballi cimba...@cimballi.net wrote:
From: Cimballi cimba...@cimballi.net
Subject: Bugs in OrderView.groovy
To: user user@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 3:39 PM
Hi,
Hi Cimballi
Inconsistencies aren't necessarily bugs, but you are most welcome to
create a patch and jira issue for the corrections you think should be
made.
Thanks
Scott
On 30/05/2009, at 10:39 AM, Cimballi wrote:
Hi,
There are several inconsistancies in the file
Well, I don't know how to explain you, it seems evident to me...
In the first case you check if productStore is null or not. In the
second case, you don't check.
So, what is the correct behaviour ? Should an order be linked to a
productStore or not ?
If yes, why the first test ?
If no, there is
I will give you a general answer to all you statements.
this is a community effort.
the people that answer on the mailing list do so as a volunteers, not as
a paid support person.
You may have a valid point. Don't expect a response if you don't want to
follow the guidelines that have been setup.
Hello Arpit,
Thanks for raising this issue.
I agree that the code is broken in this area, as I noticed the same thing
before 1 week or so.
Thanks for your research, I will try to find some time very soon and will
see what you have explored then will share my thoughts.
In the meantime if someone
Comments inline:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:33 PM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
if you need the orginal email you can do two things
1) you can ask the mailing list server to send you those numbers. so you
can then reply. Since you have those numbers I assume you have the
instructions
it is how I fill in the gaps of my own libary that goes back to 2002
that is what I search on
:D
Ashish Vijaywargiya sent the following on 5/29/2009 10:01 PM:
Comments inline:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:33 PM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
if you need the orginal email you can do
Working perfectly fine for me on Demo Server.
Cimballi,
Please do check once more. You might missed something.
Regards
--
Chirag Manocha
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
Website :- www.hotwaxmedia.com
Contact :- +91-98263-19099
Cimballi wrote:
Hi,
There is another bug in the Lookup Order(s) screen.
Hum, I confirm the bug is there. You just have to unselect all Status,
keep the Type on Sales Order, click on Find, and it will return 2
orders, a Sales one and a Purchase one, which is not normal as only
Sales Order is selected.
Cimballi
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Chirag Manocha
I am confused from your question.
What do you mean by Lookup Order(s) screen ?
Are you talking about Find Order Screen or the Screen that comes as a pop up
where you can search orders (If you are talking about pop up then please let
us know the exact reference) ?
If it is the case of Find Order
Thanks, I was starting to think I was crazy :-)
For Ashish, I was speaking about this screen :
https://demo904.ofbiz.org/ordermgr/control/main
And the problem is for demo904.ofbiz.org and demo.ofbiz.org
One message for the commiters, right now I am doing a lot of tests, I
just posted 3-5 bugs
Thanks Chirag for your comment.
His comment make me more sense now.
Sorry for creating confusion but Lookup word deviate my mind to Pop-up
screens in ofbiz.
It looks like you are helping Cimballi good so I am moving out.
--
Ashish
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Chirag Manocha
Please see my comments inline:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Cimballi cimballi.cimba...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks, I was starting to think I was crazy :-)
For Ashish, I was speaking about this screen :
https://demo904.ofbiz.org/ordermgr/control/main
And the problem is for
Good to know but difficult to accept this with Windows box ;o).
--
Ashish
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com wrote:
I run OFBiz on a number of Windows XP boxes and I don't have any
performance problems. Running ant run-install on a fresh checkout takes 3
minutes.
54 matches
Mail list logo
