Thanks guys - I will try and work out how services work.
Cheers
Sam
On 14/07/2010 09:34, BJ Freeman wrote:
yes correct I misread and fromdates earlier.
Scott Gray sent the following on 7/13/2010 6:16 PM:
I'm not sure what your are saying but I didn't mention null
fromDates. I said:
Thanks for the reply.
I will cross check my PayPal settings.
regards
Gaurav
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/PayPal-Currency-Issue-tp2287192p2288380.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Good morning guys!!!
How are You? Fine? hehehe
I'll see de price of the books and buy, this is the way...
hehehe,
So, I would wanna ask you!!!
If you know ONE big store that use the OFBiz as a ecommerce.
I Need to see some reals exemples!!!
Please, I Need to see!!!
Since the documentation
This might help
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Apache+OFBiz+Service+Providers
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Apache+OFBiz+Service+Providers
Thanks,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Mateus Medice mateus.med...@gmail.comwrote:
Good morning guys!!!
How are
Hello Mateus:
Please don't confuse the work I'm doing on the MyOFBiz.com website with
the Apache OFBiz project and this mailing list. I have no affiliation
with the Apache OFBiz project. I am not a project committer. And,
although I have offered to work as a committee member to help organize
Two of our clients' e-commerce web sites are:
http://www.louielighting.com/
http://www.goldencharm.co.uk/
Thanks,
Raj
On 14/07/10 17:01, Mateus Medice wrote:
Good morning guys!!!
How are You? Fine? hehehe
I'll see de price of the books and buy, this is the way...
hehehe,
So, I would wanna
I'm testing my new store, when I decide to login as a user and cancel
an order (which is suppose to work). The user sees this:
The Following Errors Occurred:
Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException:
Service invocation error (Could not commit transaction for service
I know the OFBiz home page (ofbiz.apache.org) has been watered down, but it's
not this bad... there are links from there to community-maintained resources
that answer all of this.
Have you read through the home page and tried following through a few of the
links?
Also, for everyone who has
I appreciate you input and reminder.
remember this is not a paid organization but volunteers.
and things do slip by.
the PMC have instituted a few months ago the status patch ready to help
inform committers so such slip ups are found
Also any Branch release is for the best part bug free, but
Each release is only as good as the community makes it. Community is the key
word here, nobody gets paid to make sure Mike Z is downloading a bug free
release.
My guess is that most implementations have chosen not to allow customer's to
cancel their orders and hence the bug doesn't concern
After a little thinking of that I chose the multi tenancy option. But now a
new problem has been raised and it's regarding to data loading. I have my
own data as ext and I want to split/adapt it in order to fill the different
tenants with it.
As I read in another posts I found that this topic was
Thanks for trying to help...I am learning something, but my problem is still
not resolved. It seems that estimatedSetupMillis is not defined at this
point. Whether I put it under row-actions, actions, or in the
default-value attribute of text I get nothing in all three cases. If I
replace
The community (Abdullah Shaikh) took the time, researched, identified,
coded, and submitted a patch. I don't know what more could have been
asked of the community. I'm a new guy here true, but I'd like to know
that if I took the time to submit a fix to ofbiz, for the benefit of
the community,
Thanks BJ. I hope it was just an oversight. 9.04 seems pretty rock
solid otherwise. Even so, starting a local repository is probably the
way to go, because I'll surely be tweaking it as I learn more.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:50 PM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
I appreciate you
Please understand that when you are speaking of the OFBiz community (or any
Apache community) there is no us and them. OFBiz is a community-driven
project, meaning everyone involved in the community is a volunteer contributor,
even those with commits privileges. None of the committers have any
Actually, in spite of what BJ says there is nothing that makes the release
branches more bug-free than the trunk. Well, nothing unless people work to make
it so. Release branches just change less so it is easier to fix bugs without
having to deal with as much of a possibility of new bugs being
My apologies to all. I didn't mean to offend. I think ofbiz is a
fantastic project, and I'm very grateful for the community
involvement, developers, and contributors. I'll try to behave better.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:16 PM, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
Please understand that when you
Things are never as clear cut as they first appear and simple bugs are often
fixed pretty quickly.
In this case however, a committer cannot just grab Abdullah's patch and dump it
in without first taking time to understand the problem and the proposed fix.
There are a number of issues to
I am always amazed at how you spin things david.
David E Jones sent the following on 7/14/2010 5:22 PM:
Actually, in spite of what BJ says there is nothing that makes the release
branches more bug-free than the trunk. Well, nothing unless people work to make
it so. Release branches just
Just imagine how disappointed I have been to see this effect play out in
reality! All that time invested in community building and... :)
-David
On Jul 14, 2010, at 7:11 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
I am always amazed at how you spin things david.
David E Jones sent the following on 7/14/2010
Hey Guys,
I am wondering how other people get over this problem?
If you have multiple websites running in OFBiz at the same time then
they will all be mounted at different urls e.g. /ecommerce /ecommerce2
/ecommerce3 for three different websites.
Now its easy to setup ajp/httpd to point
Hi Sam,
It is complicated and short answer is ProxyPass directive of mod_proxy
does not rewrite the absolute links embedded in the pages whereas OFBiz
links are absolute links. The solution is to use mod_proxy_html module
to rewrite the links embedded links
Cheers will go have a read
Sam
On 15/07/2010 12:27, Raj Saini wrote:
Hi Sam,
It is complicated and short answer is ProxyPass directive of mod_proxy
does not rewrite the absolute links embedded in the pages whereas OFBiz
links are absolute links. The solution is to use mod_proxy_html
I understand that a bug like this may have underlying security issues,
so it would need a complete code review by the experts. Hard to
believe that this hasn't received more attention, so maybe it isn't
important, or folks aren't testing their stores. It was important
enough to Abdullah to fix,
It's an interesting problem for sure. Currently the URL writing method
RequestHandler.makeLink(...) (which the ofbizUrl transform delegates to) uses
the _CONTROL_PATH_ request attribute to add the control path portion of the
URL.
As a short term test you could try overwriting that attribute
Hi all,
Thanks in advance for time to comment on it.
I have a problem with StatusItem table while i had changed the description
for
CRQ_ACCEPTED,CRQ_REVIEWED and CRQ_ .. but the are not reflecting on find
request status drop down
and other place also.
please if any know what is the reason
26 matches
Mail list logo
