Hi,
is OFBiz really XHTML 1.0 valid? Catalog component
( https://demo904.ofbiz.org/catalog ) has 25 errors and 7 warnings
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fdemo904.ofbiz.org%
2Fcatalog%2Fcontrol%2Flogin%2Fmain%3FUSERNAME%3Ddemoadmin%26PASSWORD%
Ján, its as valid as you make it. The XHTML is generated by the
widgets, servlets, and ftl templates that go into the page. If the
programmer who put together the demo catalog did not create valid
XHTML, then it won't pass the validator. Clean HTML, XHTML, etc. is a
great goal, which
Thanks for explanation, but Amazon.com haven't this
https://demo904.ofbiz.org/images/valid-xhtml10.png on _every_ page. And
catalog is part of ofbiz, it isn't 3rd party application deployed to
OFBiz. I wondered why is logo XHTML 1.0 valid on XHTML 1.0 non-valid
page creted by ofbiz team.
ya
Dňa
at the point that ofbiz put the compliance on the footer, I was.
However there has not been in real testing with all the commits and
changes in the last few years.
if this is a concern of your please feel free to contribute and effort
towards that end.
The point is valid that a page that wears the badge should have been
tested to make sure that it still complies. However, this is an open
source, community supported, project -- not a shrink wrapped
commercial product with a large marketing and legal department
insuring that enough
Thanks John. Very well put.
-David
On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:50 PM, John Hays wrote:
The point is valid that a page that wears the badge should have been
tested to make sure that it still complies. However, this is an open
source, community supported, project -- not a shrink wrapped
