You mean only orderProcessXPDL.xml?
I think it should not be removed but moved to where it belongs (to avoid dependency from a specialpurpose component to an
applications component)
If you thought about the whole stuff, you may have a look at
http://markmail.org/message/fmcdrzmmakowpcjd
Is orderProcessXPDL.xml used by anything in Ofbiz? if so, where and how?
Many thanks,
Chris
Shark is disabled, since the integration was not completed.
See the Shark container.
chris snow sent the following on 9/19/2010 11:39 AM:
Is orderProcessXPDL.xml used by anything in Ofbiz? if so, where and how?
Many thanks,
Chris
Is there any value in keeping files like these if they aren't used?
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
Shark is disabled, since the integration was not completed.
See the Shark container.
chris snow sent the following on 9/19/2010 11:39 AM:
Is
there seems to be a movement to remove a lot of unused stuff.
I my personal value is that this is a community and as we grow some one
may take an interest.
so only things that have been superseded should be removed.
like if there is a business language interface that has been implemented.
Hi BJ, keeping old stuff around makes the framework harder to master.
Could the file be archived somewhere? That way, it's clear to users
that it isn't important, but is still around if someone wants to
finish off the functionality.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:22 PM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net
Is this file used: OrderProcessWorkflow.xml?
how about an svn log comment that says see the shark if your interested.
that way if someone runs across it they may get interested, but if put
away it is more like out of sight out of mind.
However if you get drool implemented and in the trunk or I get the
business Basic integrated, I can see
svn log sounds good - will you be deleted this and other deprecated files now?
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:41 PM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
how about an svn log comment that says see the shark if your interested.
that way if someone runs across it they may get interested, but if put
Actually, that file was for the OFBiz Workflow Engine, which Shark is partially
based on, and which has been removed from the project.
This is another one of those things that has failed to attract sufficient
attention over the years, probably because workflow engines are a lame and
so can all this old stuff be removed?
Hi Chris,
BJ mentioned that only things that have been superseded should be removed.
chris snow wrote:
so can all this old stuff be removed?
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/ofbiz-release10-04-where-is-orderProcessXPDL-xml-used-tp2546089p2546549.html
12 matches
Mail list logo
