I don't think we can remove the records from the Enumeration entity.
The idea (but it is my idea for now, not an official plan) is to use
the InventoryItemDetail for staoring all the information about a
manual variance (it is already done actually... using the enumId to
keep track of the
This is an qestion from Bruno in OFBIZ-1734
I have seen that the values defined in the entity VarianceReason are
exactly matching the ones defined in the Entity Enumeration with
enumTypeId=IID_REASON.
Is this by design or may be should one of the two removed?
Is it ok to remove duplicate values
Thanks for clarifying Jacopo
Hello, I am trying to create an order via webservices, and I am stuck :(
I have until now had succes with these steps:
Services:
1) createOrderHeader
2) addOrderRole
3) createOrderContactMech
SOMETHING MISSING HERE!
4) appendOrderItem
Step 4 fails. The message is: Please
Hi All,
I have a case where I checkout an order of amount say
$325(including taxes, shipping, promo..) and use Credit Card as its payment
method. We are using third party service(Paypal) for making the payments.
Now the final order page shows proper total amount i.e $325 but the
since this mailing list only supports the ofbiz in the official ofbiz
SVN, it is difficult to help with variances like opentaps.
I suggest you go to their forums and ask you question.
https://sourceforge.net/forum/?group_id=145855
Yitao_Zhao sent the following on 4/10/2008 4:51 AM:
Hello, I am
What version of the trunk or Version 4.0 are you using?
do you have any error logs?
Tushar Abhyankar sent the following on 4/10/2008 5:11 AM:
Hi All,
I have a case where I checkout an order of amount say
$325(including taxes, shipping, promo..) and use Credit Card as its payment
Thanks for the reply. I am not getting any errors for the issue but the
amount entered in table OrderHeader and OrderPaymentPreference is different.
The code base was downloaded in Feb 2006 and probably the Version is 2.2,
It's pretty old.
-Original Message-
From: BJ Freeman
Yes, in fact it is.
OFBiz already do something regarding accounting for transfers, it is
automatically taken care of when the owner parties of the facilities are
different.
I think the recommendation of Si in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-352 is the way to go with this
issue.
I
Doubt anyone here is familiar with the 2.2 anymore
The code available now is Ver 4.0.
if I remember correctly there was quite a change from 2.2 to 3.0.
there is an other big change from 3.0 to 4.0
it would take some effort to export the data from 2.2, if possible, then
manually change the
it is best to ask opentaps questions on
https://sourceforge.net/forum/?group_id=145855
Daniel Riquelme sent the following on 4/10/2008 7:15 AM:
Yes, in fact it is.
OFBiz already do something regarding accounting for transfers, it is
automatically taken care of when the owner parties of the
This is an interesting thread.
We should also consider that very often a TO should be treated like a
standard sales/purchase order where one division orders some product
from the other one, the items are shipped and received (aka
transferred) and invoiced.
And the accounting transactions
Well, I've been having some odd issues lately, and while working them out,
at one point I figured I'd pull down a new SVN trunk and fiddle around a
bit.
When I go to build with ant I get the following when It gets to the POS
stuff. (the carrots (^) lost their spaces so don't pay attention to
Build OFBiz on revision 646797.
Worked fine without any error, except with few warnings because of
deprecated methods.
Vikas
On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:15 PM, Branden Strickland wrote:
Well, I've been having some odd issues lately, and while working
them out,
at one point I figured I'd pull
Hi
When i create a configurable product , during the shipping process the
configuration optional product are not associated to my package.
I have create for example a package with two configurable product:
Product A: option1=Local + 50$
option2=Internationl + 150$
According
In 2006 the version was 3.1, but anyway, yes it's pretty old...
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doubt anyone here is familiar with the 2.2 anymore
The code available now is Ver 4.0.
if I remember correctly there was quite a change from 2.2 to 3.0.
there is an other big change from
could we chalk this up to a bad Java environment? I only ask this becuase
previous user list discussions having to do with the POS portion involving
the Epson Jpos ADK install messing with classpaths and some other things
that a java based printer driver shouldn't be messing with.
Just
Would anyone happen to have an install or link to an install of the old
ADK.
I'd love to evaluate it and compare it to 1.11.
Thanks.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi,
I have a business requirement where I need to indicate Call for price for
certain products (not allowed to display price for reasons). Was wondering
what would be the best way to flag a product to be call for price.
I dont see a price type OOTB which matches the requirement.
Also, has
unless the code you have is from the SVN, any answers will not be helpful.
please let us know weather you using Ver 4.0 or Trunk SVN and the revision.
ladroge sent the following on 4/10/2008 8:10 AM:
Hi
When i create a configurable product , during the shipping process the
configuration
SOLVED:
This was my error.
I was installing jdk1.6.0_05.bin and in ubuntu I accidentally used sudo to
unpack it. Making all java stuff owned by root:root. I'm so used to RPMS
where you can run it as sudo or root, but the rpm will place correct
ownership.
Completely my fault!
On Thu, Apr 10,
here is his email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following on 4/9/2008 1:58 PM:
Brandon
The guy you are looking for would be Jonathon from Singapore. Sadly, I
haven't seen him on in quite a while.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Brendan Vogt [mailto:[EMAIL
23 matches
Mail list logo
