Hi Rick,
Yes, see the index element:
If you search the code base for 'unique="true"' you should find some
examples.
Regards
Scott
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 17:23, Richard Fleming wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is there a way to define a database unique constraint when defining an
> entity
> in the
Your form contains duplicate inputs for each of your field names, one
hidden for each and one visible (date, number etc.).
When this is submitted, the duplicates will be combined into an array of
values for the given parameter name.
ServletRequest#getParameter will only return the FIRST value in
I don't think that would cause this problem, the next occurrence of a job
is scheduled when the current job is queued (or started, I can't remember
exactly) so generally the runTime values should be roughly 5 minutes apart
regardless of how long the job takes to run. Some time is lost between
Hi everyone,
I was recently made aware of an attack on an OFBiz deployment using the
vulnerability described below. The attackers were able to exploit the
xmlrpc endpoint to initiate a full export of the database. Fortunately
this deployment had an extremely large database and the attempt set
Have you tried setting the list price to zero? Alternatively, if you want
to maintain a value in list price then use two price rule actions:
1. Percentage of list price: -100
2. Percentage of average cost: 130
That should set the first modifier to effectively zero the starting price,
and then
My knowledge is a little bit out of date but the code used to be able to
fallback through to the default locale and if it still didn't find anything
then it would simply output the key instead.
For example if the user's locale was zh_cn and the default locale was en_US
then it would look for a
t choose one of:
> 1- removing id-ne
> 2- reintroducing validation
>
> On May 4, 2017 3:10 AM, "Scott Gray" <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
>
> > Took a while to dig it out but here it is:
> > http://ofbiz.markmail.org/thread/c6ee3ewyo6jpik7k
> >
&g
of the
> validation
> > > attributes and how they apply.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Aditya Sharma
> > Enterprise Software Engineer
> > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/
> >
> >
It was removed purposefully and there was a discussion about it. I'd
suggest we all need to go back and look at that discussion before deciding
how to proceed.
Regards
Scott
On 1/05/2017 19:03, "Taher Alkhateeb" wrote:
> I don't have the historical context, so
I get those notifications from the user list maybe once a month on my
personal gmail, not sure of the cause.
Regards
Scott
On 12/04/2017 02:44, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think I receive messages from the list, but sometimes I get a copy of
> what I'm forwarding below...my email
Is there any indication it consumes anything other than some small amount
of RAM after startup?
Regards
Scott
On 19 March 2017 at 22:23, Pierre Smits wrote:
> With respect to gradle that is not entirely true. As you use it to run
> OFBiz it will continue to consume
Hi Milan,
You may want to consider implementing your own service engine
implementation, there really isn't much to it and from there you can send
the events however you like to wherever you like. Take a look at the
HttpEngine as an example. Once you've defined an engine you then need to
define
e to fix related issues if
they stumble upon. Else if you think it's confusing, please feel free to
change the summary and description, maybe by adding your comment below?
Jacques
Le 18/02/2017 à 11:37, Scott Gray a écrit :
> There was no bug report in this thread, just some vague
h was initially reported in this thread. I
> understand that we should rather refactor FinAccount services and I have
> opened a Jira for that
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9221
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 18/02/2017 à 08:06, Scott Gray a écrit :
>
>&
/2017 01:52, "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Should we not open a Jira and try to fix this bug?
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 16/02/2017 à 04:04, Scott Gray a écrit :
>
>> For example, a current project has s
r <r...@pandastrike.com> wrote:
> Thanks Scott. Since I am new to OfBiz can you provide a code example? I.e.
> by what means are you issuing an arbitrary no-op update statement on a
> parent row?
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:02 PM Scott Gray <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com>
>
Hi Robb,
I've encountered similar deadlocks in the past and have simply issued an
update statement on the main row before attempting to work with any child
rows. That has the same effect as the FOR UPDATE statement but without
needing to enhance the framework.
Regards
Scott
On 16/02/2017 08:03,
Hi David,
In my personal experience I'm yet to fully implement GL functionality for a
client, although that isn't saying much because most of the contracts I've
been involved in span multiple years so we're only talking a few projects
really.
We'll often start working on it by mapping
I don't personally recall seeing Pierre break any of the linked guidelines
aside from cross posting to dev/private. IMO his marketing messages are
neither excessive or unfair. So maybe, just maybe, this isn't about
Pierre. And maybe we should stop worrying about who/what triggered it and
instead
It may have been a side-effect of cross-posting. The other replies may not
have been visible if they were replying from a different list (due to
filtering or whatever). It's not uncommon for people to only see pieces of
a conversation when cross-posting is involved.
I don't see it as a personal
Actually, I asked Pierre not to cross post less than a week ago and this is
the 2nd time he's done it since. Perhaps a few more requests are warranted
since he seems to ignore them.
These recent instances aren't the first time we've been through this with
Pierre either. I get the feeling he
Hi Pierre,
Could you please stop cross-posting?
http://apache.org/dev/contrib-email-tips.html#rightlist
http://directory.apache.org/mailing-lists-and-irc.html
I understand you're a PMC member of the Apache Directory project so I would
assume you're familiar with ASF email etiquette.
Many
wrote:
> Le 11/10/2016 à 23:59, Scott Gray a écrit :
>
>> I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the
>>>
>> rest. Else maybe we should remove it...
>>
>> Jacques I think you've been around long enough to know that a committer's
>
> I hope the committer who introduced this feature will take care of the
rest. Else maybe we should remove it...
Jacques I think you've been around long enough to know that a committer's
responsibility to a contribution doesn't extend to years of support. If I
found a bug in your
Another possible option (which I've never tried), is to use the multi
tenancy functionality to allow two different sets of data without needing
to restart OFBiz or run multiple instances.
Regards
Scott
On 12 October 2016 at 07:40, Craig Parker wrote:
> I was initially
Hi Mirko,
I had a quick look at the code and it looks to me like the GenericRequester
is used if passed in but only if the job is run in memory instead of being
persisted to the database. Are you seeing something different or are you
expecting that it would be serialized and stored with the job?
I'm certainly no fan of minilang. I prefer something I can step through
with a debugger.
Regards
Scott
On 9/08/2016 20:55, "Paul Piper" wrote:
> Skip,
>
> I fear that you may be right with regards to minilang and the community,
> though luckily with your own projects you can
You can leave your code mostly the same, but just require a new transaction
for createOrder, you'll see the option available in the runSync overloaded
methods.
I've been working with an older version of OFBiz for the last few years so
I wasn't aware of this change, but I believe it is better than
m Jain a écrit :
>
>> Thanks, shouldn't this be committed in SVN then?
>>
>> --
>> Vyom
>>
>> On 29 February 2016 at 14:51, Scott Gray <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Actually yes, I have encountered this. I fixed it
Actually yes, I have encountered this. I fixed it with the following
class, which you would then use in the DBCPConnectionFactory class in place
of the PoolableManagedConnectionFactory.
/**
* An extension to the DBCP2 PoolableManagedConnectionFactory that ensures
that
* PoolableConnections
It's most likely a race condition in the UtilCache getOrCreate method (the
exact name escapes me without looking). Does it a actually cause any issues
or is it just strange?
On 20 Jan 2016 11:41, "Len Shein" wrote:
> All,
>
> There have been instances where one or more of the
That error looks like a bug in CompanyHeader.groovy, it's not check that an
address was retrieved before trying to access it.
You can work around that issue by adding a "General Location" postal
address for the company party. It might not help your currency issue, but
will get you one step
That's incorrect, there is no foreign-key dependency between
SecurityGroupPermission and SecurityPermission and this is done on purpose.
Here's an old discussion on the topic:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/security-permission-td154203.html#a154208
Regards
Scott
On 29 December 2015 at 05:06,
That's a problem in the older versions caused by concurrent access to the
cached dom model of the serviceengine.xml file. The dom doesn't support
concurrent reads and you'll intermittently see this problem.
The only solution is to store the serviceengine configuration in POJOs
rather than caching
I've seen it done with a separate Delegator but it needed a code change
since there's no configurable way to disable the JobManager.
Main issues to be aware of:
- Transaction isolation, you can't see uncommitted modifications made in
same call chain
- If the read replica lags too far behind then
http://markmail.org/message/mzbu3i336uu6csps
As always, there's plenty of previous discussion if you search for purchase
order tax on ofbiz.markmail.org
Regards
Scott
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Christian Carlow
christian.car...@gmail.com wrote:
If Accounting-Tax Authorities-Product
://www.olagos.nl
2014-12-09 4:13 GMT+01:00 Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com:
You'd probably need to consider looking into browser extension.
VendHQ is a web-based POS SaaS and their solution to this problem is
documented here:
http://support.vendhq.com/hc/en-us/articles
You'd probably need to consider looking into browser extension.
VendHQ is a web-based POS SaaS and their solution to this problem is
documented here:
http://support.vendhq.com/hc/en-us/articles/201378390-Enable-kiosk-silent-printing-for-Google-Chrome-on-Windows-Video-
Regards
Scott
On Sat, Dec
How is it that you are able to extract so many paragraphs out of the few
sentences I wrote?
What are you trying to achieve here? As far as I can tell you're the only one
who has questions about how a contributor becomes a committer. How much detail
is required for something that requires a
http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
Perhaps accept is a better word than follow, no one has ever
questioned
...
Or am I misinterpreting this?
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote
Hi Pierre,
Jacopo's first words in that email were In my opinion. That's an extremely
important point.
There are no guidelines because each PMC member is free to vote however they
feel would best serve the project. Any of us could provide our own personal
guidelines but they would still
the collective perception.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
Hi
to those of the
community?
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote
discussions and recent activity.
Ron
On 02/10/2014 3:02 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Surely the first step in considering a specialized component for sub-project
creation would be the level of activity surrounding the component?
Looking at the history of the projectmgr component I see 12 commits
of
components.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
We have mailing
etc. does the opposite.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote
Surely the first step in considering a specialized component for sub-project
creation would be the level of activity surrounding the component?
Looking at the history of the projectmgr component I see 12 commits in the last
TWO years 8 of which were global changes that coincidentally happened
Quite a novel you've written there Piere. There's so many things I'd like to
clarify in your rant but you're so far detached from the reality of how this
community works that it's gotten to the point of being pointless.
Regards
Scott
On 19 September 2014 20:59:48 GMT+12:00, Pierre Smits
I guess it's the strange way that you word some of your emails.
Instead of directing the question to someone who could answer it, the mailing
list moderators, you directed your question to the community at large. Doing
so can give the impression that there is something wrong with the health
GlAccountOrganization looks like it could be contentious for locks due to the
postedBalance field (lots of separate long running transactions trying to
update multiple rows at the same time). The service updating it probably needs
refactoring so that the update is moved to a smaller
I won't be attending simply because it is organized by Pierre (and because the
genesis of this meeting seems to have come from a very negative perspective).
Those of you who are new to the community or who he is polite to may not be
aware of how rude Pierre can be. While he does do some good
No I would say it's a perfectly appropriate venue given the context of the
discussion.
Regards
Scott
On 14/03/2014, at 3:35 AM, Mike wrote:
I believe he is a destructive force in the community
This is an inappropriate venue for personal attacks.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Scott
Check that resource URLs aren't html encoded, some browsers fail to send cookie
information in that situation which causes a new session to be created.
Scott
On 2/01/2014, at 12:16 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
1)
In the backend, when having logged in a tenant, we experience that when
having
Check first that the days variable is actually a number in the freemarker
context. It could be that the formatting is happening earlier which would
explain why your efforts to change the formatting aren't working (because the
value may already be a string).
Regards
Scott
On 30/07/2013, at
I just want to bump this on the lists since that Douglas Cook idiot was causing
a distraction.
It's very important that everyone with the OFBiz versions mentioned below (and
trunk checkouts prior to r1500772) either upgrade or patch their installations
as soon as possible. I cannot stress
Vani wrote:
There are quantity fields in ProductAssoc and ProductCategoryMember entities,
I wonder what they are for. Didn't dig into the code, thought someone might
already know and can help.
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:04:59 +0530, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
Hi Robert
Hi Robert,
I don't believe the quantity field has a use in virtual/variant associations
(but I could be wrong). I think you'd want a setup similar to the following:
- A product for the supplier that sells double packs (Product A)
- A product for the suppler that sells single packs (Product B)
-
aware of (ie people looking at Moqui/Mantle/etc and deciding to
use OFBiz instead).
-David
On May 31, 2013, at 3:03 AM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
Al,
Privately or not, if this is how you intend to interact with OFBiz users by
actively encouraging them to switch
Al,
Privately or not, if this is how you intend to interact with OFBiz users by
actively encouraging them to switch to the competing framework that you're
currently working with, then I'd strongly encourage you to resign from the
OFBiz PMC. It's really not the type of project management we
project management that
requires active PMC members. I will send my resignation request to the pmc
list where this conversation should probably take place.
-Al
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote:
Al,
Privately or not, if this is how you intend
Oh hi Pierre, how did things go at ApacheCon Europe?
Regards
Scott
On 21/03/2013, at 6:01 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi All,
In a screen.xml I can have a pop-up window with following
code:
link target=EditProductLayer?productId=${productId} link-type=
ajax-window width=1000 height=400
Doubles have no place in financial transactions, the correct fix is to set a
scale on the divide operation.
Regards
Scott
On 11/01/2013, at 11:30 PM, Deepak Agarwal dagarwa...@gmail.com wrote:
InvoiceServices.java :
billingAmount =
That is not a valid example, you should never modify the JobSandbox directly.
Use dispatcher.schedule(...)
Regards
Scott
On 9/01/2013, at 6:21 AM, mohd Viqar wrote:
Here is an example
now-timestamp field=currentTime/
set-calendar field=jobruntime days=14 from-field=currentTime/
Keep in mind that if your machine IP address ever changes then any jobs queued
or running at shutdown won't get picked up on restarting.
Regards
Scott
On 6/08/2012, at 3:06 PM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Many thanks Jacques - off to do some testing!
Cheers
Sam
On 4 Aug 2012, at 00:11,
It can also be a problem in tables like InventoryItemStatus or basically
anywhere in the system that depends on being able to retrieve the latest record
when it's possible for two records to have been created within the same second.
Also anywhere that depends on a timestamp as part of the
Hi Carsten,
That kek stuff is a very new addition done by Adam, I'm not sure how closely he
follows the user list so you may want to raise this up on the dev list or in
jira. My understanding though was that kek was an optional feature so this
most likely is a bug of some sort.
Regards
Scott
Hi Indela,
You need to set a Facility on your Product Store.
Data: ProductStore.facilityId
Screen: Catalog - Stores
Regards
Scott
On 9/05/2012, at 12:17 AM, indela wrote:
hi all,
i added catalog, categories and product. but when i was browse products
throw exception is like below. Why this
Please stop posting to both lists.
Thanks
Scott
On 8/05/2012, at 1:54 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Dear All,
Did you know that OFBiz contains a solution delivering a help to each
screen accessed? And do you use it?
Currently for following applications/components help is available:
-
the dev mail. I want to
invite them as well to pariticpate in the Help OFBiz Help-day.
Pierre
2012/5/7 Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Please stop posting to both lists.
Thanks
Scott
On 8/05/2012, at 1:54 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Dear All,
Did you know that OFBiz
In regards to one part of that post, I wouldn't recommend disabling Visit
tracking for ecommerce unless you have some other type of analytics in place.
It can be an invaluable resource for tracking down slow pages and also aid in
locating requests are causing errors in the logs.
Regards
Scott
Exactly, you need to perform (or have on performed on your behalf) analysis of
the site. There are plenty of OFBiz sites out there that perform just fine
with nothing much more than correctly configured cache settings.
Regards
Scott
On 3/05/2012, at 1:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
This thread
What exactly does evolving branch mean?
Regards
Scott
On 27/04/2012, at 7:27 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
It seems, though he did not annouce it (yet?), Christian finished the demos
rotation. So now we have:
demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org running trunk
demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org
released. So only released branches will figure
on main page of http://ofbiz.apache.org/
The idea is to not confuse users about not released things.
Jacques
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
What exactly does evolving branch mean?
Regards
Scott
On 27/04/2012, at 7:27 PM, Jacques
the changes.
Best regards,
Nick Rosser
nros...@salmonllc.com
516.901.1720
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 9, 2012, at 7:25 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
That's great Nick, if you could consider putting a license notice in the
distribution and perhaps a mention
On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Nick Rosser wrote:
Apache open license. Interested in your thoughts.
Nick
C: 516.901.1720
nros...@salmonllc.com
On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
Hi Nick,
Any progress on the licensing situation for the project
The main issue regardless of the URL being hit is that JSON responses return
the entire request attribute map. It is IMO a problem that we've always used
the request attributes directly to pass data from events to views.
Regards
Scott
On 6/04/2012, at 10:09 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
OK,
Hi Nick,
Any progress on the licensing situation for the project? As an OFBiz committer
I can't really look at your code without fear of tainting my open source work
until I know what the license is.
Regards
Scott
On 30/03/2012, at 4:19 AM, Nick Rosser wrote:
OFBiz users,
Over the last
IMO, each release/version is a balance of stability vs. new features. The
older a release is, the more deployments it has seen and the more likely it is
that most major bugs have been fixed. If you don't need the features in the
newer versions (most don't) then the older versions are a better
run-on-error=true, run this eca service even when the main service flow
contains an error condition
ignore-error=true, do not allow an error return from this service to cause an
error condition in the main service flow
For example if you have a validate event eca with ignore-error=false that
questions about secas and errors/failures.
Cheers,
Anne.
On 6 September 2011 17:47, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
run-on-error=true, run this eca service even when the main service flow
contains an error condition
ignore-error=true, do not allow an error return from
If this and the rental item topic are things that you plan on committing then
the discussion really belongs in the dev list.
Regards
Scott
On 30/08/2011, at 4:30 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
this is the service to a product the customer delivers adhoc, not the
products owned by the company. so not
${StringUtil.wrapString(custRequestItem.story)}
Regards
Scott
On 3/08/2011, at 3:43 AM, Gavin Mabie wrote:
Hi
I have added a visual-editor-enable=true element to the story field in the
EditCustRequestItem form. The HTML markup is now saved in the database -
but when I want to render
If you're trying to do this from within the screen widget then it is too late
at that point because the response has moved past that point. You'll need to
do it from a request event.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 27/07/2011, at 7:53 PM, Ajay Lashkari wrote:
Hi
10.04 vs 11.04 at this point? 11.04 is way better (blogging
actually works).
Also, as long as you have gone through the initial trouble of setting
up your own vendor branch (real important) using trunk is feasible.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote
--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
ofbiz.info on twitter: http://twitter.com/ofbiz_info
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 12:48 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
I'd definitely encourage early adopters to go for 11.04, but at the end
a junit test to check it what we did
for the shopping cart and checkout?
That is the best assurance an error does not come back..
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:33 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
If people are willing to believe that the trunk carries minimal extra risks
in terms of stability and bugs
IS stable enough for production.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
I'd definitely encourage early adopters to go for 11.04, but at the end of
the day the choice between 10.04, 11.04 or the trunk is simply a matter of
weighing the desire for new features
Yeah, checking for the _ERROR_MESSAGE* keys is the right way to go, would be
great if you could create a jira issue so this doesn't get lost.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 17/07/2011, at 7:56 AM, Jonatan Soto wrote:
Well, I did a little read on the jquery ajax
That configuration is for the frequency of job polls. There isn't any ability
to specify the transaction timeout via configuration so you'll need to modify
the code directly:
JobManager.java (line 148):
beganTransaction = TransactionUtil.begin();
needs to be changed to use
Scott
On 14/07/2011, at 1:02 PM, Josh Jacobson wrote:
Scott,
Thanks! That is very precise advise. Do you have a suggestion on
interval time? 60 seconds? 120?
Thanks,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
That configuration is for the frequency
Jacobson wrote:
Thanks again. I actually meant a suggestion for the transaction
timeout. In any case I am grateful for your explanation.
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
As best I can tell there shouldn't be any need to increase the interval
between
to 2.6
million rows. Ofbiz was pretty much unusable.
If you have any other suggestions I'd love Yo hear them.
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
Ah okay, that is entirely dependent on the number of jobs and the speed the
server can process them
If someone hasn't suggested it already then get rid of this section:
delegator name=other entity-model-reader=main
entity-group-reader=main entity-eca-reader=main
group-map group-name=org.ofbiz datasource-name=localpostgres/
/delegator
You don't have a localpostgres datasource
You'll have to provide more detail about the error, but
GenericEntity.getXXX(...) doesn't really throw any sort of exceptions.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 29/06/2011, at 10:45 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
I know you can, through expressions, setup null_field parms.
I
) denylistitr.next();
I am getting a
java.lang.NullPointerException on this line
String remoteHoststr =denylistrcd.getString(remoteHost);
it works find it the field is not null
Scott Gray sent the following on 6/28/2011 3:55 PM:
You'll have to provide more detail about the error
Wrong mailing list, try the opentaps one.
Regards
Scott
On 26/06/2011, at 9:36 AM, rugstan rugs...@gmail.com wrote:
I a getting a error when I am reciving a offline payment for a order which is
approved.
Below is the error.
*Error Recieving offline Payment
problem storing recieved
The implementation would not be trivial, the simple method structure wouldn't
easily support this type of control flow. Plus it would be difficult to get
the xsd right, allowing the operation to appear only within the iterable
operations but possibly deeply nested.
Regards
Scott
On
Use a while loop and change the condition to false once you're done, you'll
have to manually iterate though. Or you could do as suggested and use the
return tag, just move the loop out to a separate inline simple-method so that
the return only effects the loop.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
It's just marketing speak being used to show the range of Enterprise Solutions
at the ASF, not necessarily projects presenting at the conference.
Regards
Scott
On 21/06/2011, at 9:26 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I read at http://na11.apachecon.com/ that there seems to be a presentation
1 - 100 of 1072 matches
Mail list logo