[mailto:vadim.bichuts...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2015 5:37 PM
*To:* Saisai Shao
*Cc:* user@spark.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: DStream Union vs. StreamingContext Union
Thanks Saisai. That makes sense. Just seems redundant to have both.
ᐧ
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Saisai Shao sai.sai.s
*To:* Evo Eftimov
*Cc:* Saisai Shao; user@spark.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: DStream Union vs. StreamingContext Union
Thanks Evo. I tried chaining Dstream unions like what you have and it
didn't work for me. But passing
multiple arguments to StreamingContext.union worked fine. Any idea why? I
...@isecc.com
wrote:
I can confirm it does work in Java
*From:* Vadim Bichutskiy [mailto:vadim.bichuts...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2015 5:53 PM
*To:* Evo Eftimov
*Cc:* Saisai Shao; user@spark.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: DStream Union vs. StreamingContext Union
Thanks Evo. I tried
I can confirm it does work in Java
From: Vadim Bichutskiy [mailto:vadim.bichuts...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 5:53 PM
To: Evo Eftimov
Cc: Saisai Shao; user@spark.apache.org
Subject: Re: DStream Union vs. StreamingContext Union
Thanks Evo. I tried chaining Dstream unions like
Thanks Saisai. That makes sense. Just seems redundant to have both.
ᐧ
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Saisai Shao sai.sai.s...@gmail.com
wrote:
DStream.union can only union two DStream, one is itself. While
StreamingContext.union can union an array of DStreams, internally
DStream.union is a
:* Tuesday, May 12, 2015 5:37 PM
*To:* Saisai Shao
*Cc:* user@spark.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: DStream Union vs. StreamingContext Union
Thanks Saisai. That makes sense. Just seems redundant to have both.
ᐧ
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Saisai Shao sai.sai.s...@gmail.com
wrote
Bichutskiy [mailto:vadim.bichuts...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2015 5:53 PM
*To:* Evo Eftimov
*Cc:* Saisai Shao; user@spark.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: DStream Union vs. StreamingContext Union
Thanks Evo. I tried chaining Dstream unions like what you have and it
didn't work for me