Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-17 Thread netsql
What does 1.3 bring to the party? I know there will be with the composable request processor and commons chain integration. What other innovations are there in the new version? I think they also said Struts 1.3 will also be built using JDK 1.4 and to Servlet 2.3. So during evoltion, some

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-16 Thread Joe Germuska
At 9:29 PM -0700 7/15/05, Wendy Smoak wrote: From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd suggest that changes between releases should be immortalized on a Release Notes page, like the very cool one we have for 1.2.7: * http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html Noted. ;) Joe, is it

Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-15 Thread Yaroslav Novytskyy
Hello! Michael Jouravlev wrote: (imitating Donkey) Me, me, pick me! ;-) I am currently in the process of rewriting Mail Reader with Struts Dialogs. You would not believe how nicer it gets ;) Can you please provide a link to (or share if they are not jet) sources. I'm very interested of

Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-15 Thread James Mitchell
/ 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List user@struts.apache.org Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 12:28 AM Subject: Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3] James

Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-15 Thread netsql
James Mitchell wrote: as soon as I get back, we will roll a release, or die trying ;) that would be greeat. .V - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-15 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
What does 1.3 bring to the party? I know there will be with the composable request processor and commons chain integration. What other innovations are there in the new version? -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== On 7/14/05, Access Denied

Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-15 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 7/15/05, Yaroslav Novytskyy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! Can you please provide a link to (or share if they are not jet) sources. I'm very interested of how Struts Dialogs work, and will appriciate any links, examples, docs Is this the one that will be also used in Shale? No, it has

Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-15 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 7/15/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/15/05, Yaroslav Novytskyy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! Can you please provide a link to (or share if they are not jet) sources. I'm very interested of how Struts Dialogs work, and will appriciate any links, examples, docs

Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-15 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Must... not... volunteer... time... limited... :) Seriously, I would actually be quite interested in taking this on, but frankly I have not yet touched Shale at all, so I'm not certain I could pull it off... Certainly I couldn't guarantee that I'd do everything the *right* way :) Tell you what

Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-15 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 7/15/05, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Must... not... volunteer... time... limited... :) Seriously, I would actually be quite interested in taking this on, but frankly I have not yet touched Shale at all, so I'm not certain I could pull it off... Certainly I couldn't

RE: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-15 Thread Joe Germuska
At 4:39 PM +0100 7/15/05, Pilgrim, Peter wrote: What does 1.3 bring to the party? I know there will be with the composable request processor and commons chain integration. What other innovations are there in the new version? Probably the biggest other thing is the extends mechanism which

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-15 Thread Ted Husted
On 7/15/05, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Probably the biggest other thing is the extends mechanism which allows most config elements to extend others, eliminating some redundancies in config files. To be honest, I haven't used this much yet, but I can see where it would be pretty

Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-15 Thread Ted Husted
On 7/15/05, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One thing that can save some work is that the pseudo-database part of MailReader is already extracted out into its own module (it's in apps/dao in the source tree), which can be reused as is like it is in all the other MailReader variants.

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd suggest that changes between releases should be immortalized on a Release Notes page, like the very cool one we have for 1.2.7: * http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html Noted. ;) Joe, is it okay to take the text of your email for the new

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: Access Denied [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just bought and am reading James Holmes' book, Struts: The Complete Reference (Osborne 2004), which covers 1.2. I just learned from one of Ted Husted's posts that 1.3 is almost ready to be released. Am I wasting my time and should be studying other

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. Most of the major changes in 1.3 are 'behind the scenes' and will not affect the way you configure and use the framework. That didn't come out quite right. I meant that the changes in 1.3 don't *have* to affect the way you configure and use the

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-14 Thread Access Denied
I've seen Maven listed amongst the Apache projects and read a little. Is it supposed to replace CVS and SVN? Is this something we should be using routinely? tia, buddy On 7/14/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Access Denied [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just bought and am reading James

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-14 Thread Ivan Rodriguez
Maven is for building projects, like Ant does. Access Denied escribió: I've seen Maven listed amongst the Apache projects and read a little. Is it supposed to replace CVS and SVN? Is this something we should be using routinely? tia, buddy

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-14 Thread Joe Germuska
At 6:21 AM -0700 7/14/05, Wendy Smoak wrote: From: Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. Most of the major changes in 1.3 are 'behind the scenes' and will not affect the way you configure and use the framework. That didn't come out quite right. I meant that the changes in 1.3 don't *have* to

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-14 Thread Ted Husted
On 7/14/05, Access Denied [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just bought and am reading James Holmes' book, Struts: The Complete Reference (Osborne 2004), which covers 1.2. I just learned from one of Ted Husted's posts that 1.3 is almost ready to be released. Am I wasting my time and should be

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-14 Thread erikweber
Ted, is there a list of tasks for 1.3? By volunteer, are you referring only to current Struts committers? Erik -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jul 14, 2005 6:57 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List user@struts.apache.org Subject: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3 On 7/14/05

Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3

2005-07-14 Thread netsql
your code) .V Erik -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jul 14, 2005 6:57 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List user@struts.apache.org Subject: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3 On 7/14/05, Access Denied [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just bought and am reading James Holmes' book

Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-14 Thread James Mitchell
PROTECTED] To: user@struts.apache.org Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 7:27 PM Subject: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ted, is there a list of tasks for 1.3? By volunteer, are you referring only to current Struts committers? Anyone can edit / search bugzila. Anyone can post a diff

Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-14 Thread Michael Jouravlev
(imitating Donkey) Me, me, pick me! ;-) I am currently in the process of rewriting Mail Reader with Struts Dialogs. You would not believe how nicer it gets ;) Michael. On 7/14/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is high time we get something out there for 1.3, even if it

Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3]

2005-07-14 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: netsql [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: user@struts.apache.org Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 7:27 PM Subject: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ted, is there a list of tasks for 1.3? By volunteer, are you referring only