Re: Struts2 documentation and Stack Overflow

2016-09-01 1:45 GMT+02:00 Ken McWilliams : > StackOverflow is a pretty huge site and a lot of people seek out Struts2 > Q there, it would be nice if the Struts 2 documentation was available via > the new StackOverflow documentation initiative. > > I was tempted to simply

Re: Struts2 documentation and Stack Overflow

> From: Doug Erickson <doug.erick...@part.net> > To: Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>, > Date: 01.09.2016 02:04 > Subject: Re: Struts2 documentation and Stack Overflow > > Stack Overflow Documentation isn't meant to duplicate existing > docume

Re: Struts2 documentation and Stack Overflow

The Tao of SO is changing all the time, perceptions of what was or was not acceptable years back have changed. Documentation being so new I think it's hard to say exactly how it will establish its self. SO has _a_lot_ of struts 2 questions... 10,334 at this time. If they were all distinct that

Re: Struts2 documentation and Stack Overflow

Stack Overflow Documentation isn't meant to duplicate existing documentation. It's intended to provide missing documentation and compensate for poor documentation. So, copying current documentation to SO is definitely not in line with their goals. It *could *be a place to create better

Re: Struts2 documentation and Stack Overflow

I've not looked at the StackOverflow doc site, but I believe the documentation is auto generated by the build process, so it might be a challenge to keep it in-sync as new releases get published. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Ken McWilliams wrote: > StackOverflow is

Struts2 documentation and Stack Overflow

StackOverflow is a pretty huge site and a lot of people seek out Struts2 Q there, it would be nice if the Struts 2 documentation was available via the new StackOverflow documentation initiative. I was tempted to simply copy good chunks of the existing documentation, there is certainly room for