Il 27/03/2017 18:07, Tech ha scritto:
Just checked: the code is correct, but should be just positioned into
the beforeProvisioning, now it's correctly working.
Thanks for the support!
You're welcome
M
On 27.03.17 17:53, Tech wrote:
As described at the beginning of the thread, we
Just checked: the code is correct, but should be just positioned into
the beforeProvisioning, now it's correctly working.
Thanks for the support!
On 27.03.17 17:53, Tech wrote:
As described at the beginning of the thread, we have a pull process
taking information from a database.
We
As described at the beginning of the thread, we have a pull process
taking information from a database.
We associated the code to the action to take on the pull.
We want to pull the user into the system and to associate it to the role
based on the specific column.
As far as I understand now
Il 27/03/2017 17:12, Tech ha scritto:
We used the After because we realized that in the first time we run
the code the users were just created and only in the second time the
code was executed the users were associated to the groups, while we
wanted to have everything done at the same
Hello again,
we saw that actually implement the membership in our case is not really
working with a before, but we should implement in an after.
The group already exists in the system and we tried to implement in this
way:
@Transactional
@Override
public void after(
Yes, finally working, thanks a lot!
On 06/03/17 16:51, Marco Di Sabatino Di Diodoro wrote:
Il 06/03/2017 16:40, Tech ha scritto:
Actually you were right, we used already a "beforeUpdate".
Here the code, there is nothing strange apparently, the boolean
"result" returns "true", but the
Il 06/03/2017 16:40, Tech ha scritto:
Actually you were right, we used already a "beforeUpdate".
Here the code, there is nothing strange apparently, the boolean
"result" returns "true", but the user is not added to the group
/
/
/@Transactional//
//@Override//
//public
Actually you were right, we used already a "beforeUpdate".
Here the code, there is nothing strange apparently, the boolean "result"
returns "true", but the user is not added to the group
/
/
/@Transactional//
//@Override//
//public SyncDelta beforeUpdate(//
//final
Hi,
Il 06/03/2017 15:45, Tech ha scritto:
Hello,
as suggested, we started to work on the easiest case, we created the
Group1 in Syncope manually and we inserted into the database column
"Group" the entry "Group1".
We implemented only an "after" in this case: we pulled the information
Hello,
as suggested, we started to work on the easiest case, we created the
Group1 in Syncope manually and we inserted into the database column
"Group" the entry "Group1".
We implemented only an "after" in this case: we pulled the information
into Syncope and after the java is running.
Hi,
Il 03/03/2017 15:53, Tech ha scritto:
Hello Francesco,
we went through the directory core/src/test/resources/scriptedsql, but
we didn't find any concrete example that might help us to implement
what we might need to do, we were expecting that the solution was in
the PullActions, but
Hello Francesco,
we went through the directory core/src/test/resources/scriptedsql, but
we didn't find any concrete example that might help us to implement what
we might need to do, we were expecting that the solution was in the
PullActions, but we didn't understood that that was addressing
We didn't know at all that about the Scripted SQL connectors, we were
following the pull/pushactions examples.
On 01/03/17 14:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
Hi,
are you sure that you are using the Scripted SQL connector?
The Database Table connector, in fact, only provides support for
Hi,
are you sure that you are using the Scripted SQL connector?
The Database Table connector, in fact, only provides support for the
__ACCOUNT__ ObjectClass, e.g. only for users, as suggested by the error
below.
In order to use the Scripted SQL connector, you must also provide the
adequate
Hello,
coming back to this point: we prepared the code to integrate the group
propagation from a DB to Syncope but we encountered some problems.
Before integrating the code that we developed, we started to add the
concept of Group into our system.
* Our database has a column called
Il 06/02/2017 17:41, Marco Di Sabatino Di Diodoro ha scritto:
Hi,
Il 06/02/2017 17:11, Tech ha scritto:
Dear experts,
we're pulling information from a database. We want to assign
automatically a group to a user.
The original table has a format like
-- "USERNAME" : "user01"
--
Hi,
Il 06/02/2017 17:11, Tech ha scritto:
Dear experts,
we're pulling information from a database. We want to assign
automatically a group to a user.
The original table has a format like
-- "USERNAME" : "user01"
-- "ROLE": "employee"
In a pull task is possible to add a template. The
17 matches
Mail list logo
