ccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
*Sent:* keskiviikko 1. maaliskuuta 2017 16.30
*To:* user@syncope.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Creating a virtual schema type ->empty type list
On 01/03/2017 08:29, Mikael Ekblom wrote:
Hi,
OK, so that was the logic behind it! Now I start to ha
lso be role based. I must see what I can find for that or maybe write my own
bundle.
Regards,
Mikael
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: keskiviikko 1. maaliskuuta 2017 16.30
To: user@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: Creating a virtual schema type ->empty typ
Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
*Sent:* tiistai 28. helmikuuta 2017 17.54
*To:* user@syncope.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Creating a virtual schema type ->empty type list
On 28/02/2017 16:26, Mikael Ekblom wrote:
Hi,
We are currently evaluating Syncopy as a candidate for our fut
…
It might be that we will end up with a *nix environment in the end.
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Mikael
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: tiistai 28. helmikuuta 2017 17.54
To: user@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: Creating a virtual schema type ->empty type l
On 28/02/2017 16:26, Mikael Ekblom wrote:
Hi,
We are currently evaluating Syncopy as a candidate for our future IDM.
Hi,
glad to hear that :-)
We have some choices on the table and we are even considering writing
our own IDM from scratch, but that is something I would like to avoid
for
Hi,
We are currently evaluating Syncopy as a candidate for our future IDM. We have
some choices on the table and we are even considering writing our own IDM from
scratch, but that is something I would like to avoid for practical reasons...:)
I think that would be inventing the wheel again
