On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:37:57PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 22:54, Michael Halcrow wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:39:26PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
Well, it should be fixed in the -mm tree (and probably in 2.6.11-rc2-bk2, I
guess, though it's not tested)...
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 23:46, Michael Halcrow wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:37:57PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 22:54, Michael Halcrow wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:39:26PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
Well, it should be fixed in the -mm tree (and
I.e. the compilation problem is not in the kernel module, right? In this case,
the problem is that you have /usr/include/asm symlinked to your kernel's
include/asm-i386 directory, which is the wrong setup. However your solution
should not give any problem.
Kernel-Modules are usually compiled
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 11:24, Sven Köhler wrote:
Please note this exact sentence:
I.e. the compilation problem is not in the kernel module, right?
In this
case, the problem is that you have /usr/include/asm symlinked to your
kernel's include/asm-i386 directory, which is the wrong
Jeff,
Where and when can we see the PPC port of UML?
Maybe you can port a preview patch to the community before you put
it into the tree?
Thanks
Juergen
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open
arch/um/Kconfig_arch is actually a symlink, so
* Remove it from the tree.
* Make sure it is removed during make mrproper.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/Makefile |8 ++--
linux-2.6.11/arch/um/Kconfig_arch | 16
+1
For my purposes I need solid, stable code. I prefer a a 2.4 and 2.6
kernel that builds without too many config gotchas. And runs reliably.
e.g. right now I am using the blaisorblade 2.6.9-bs patches and the
pre-hostfs 2.4 code. That works well.
I'm all for different UML trees/patches
I would like a 2.4 that is stable. with a working hostfs.
(that i can run valgrind against - heh, not umls fault here.)
Also, the uml web site needs to be authoritative. building
the above should not require patching from additional
sources announced on the list.
That said, 2.4 and 2.6 are both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blaisorblade wrote:
| Jeff, now we need actively to make sure everything we think is crucial is
| merged in 2.6.11 - release is approaching (after -rc2 only a handful of
| patches is being merged, and the announce says Make sure I have
| everything),
