[uml-devel] [patch] Remove unnecessary config symbol from makefile.

2005-03-17 Thread Rob Landley
There can be only one! Signed-off-by: Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -ur linux-2.6.11/arch/um/Kconfig linux-2.6.11.new/arch/um/Kconfig --- linux-2.6.11/arch/um/Kconfig2005-03-02 01:38:09.0 -0600 +++ linux-2.6.11.new/arch/um/Kconfig2005-03-16 17:38:54.0 -0600 @@

[uml-devel] user-mode-linux-devel您有呆帳嗎?(ADV)19:54:308

2005-03-17 Thread 8adm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ±z¦³§b±b¶Ü¡H A8A8A ±zÃhºÃ¦Û¤v¥u¬O¹B®ð¤£¦n¶Ü¡H ±z¦³§b±b°ÝÃD­n¿Ô°Ó¶Ü¡H §A¦³¥ô¦ó¼x«H¤è­±°ÝÃD¶Ü¡H A8A8A ½Ð¥ß§Y¨Ó¹q:¢¯¢¸¢²¢·¡Ð¢¯¢¸¢²¢µ¡Ð¢±¢µ A8A8A ¤u°Ó¤Î­Ó¤H¹O±b¶Ê¦¬±M®a ¤£½×¦~¤[§b±bÁÙ¬O³Ìªñ³Â·Ð §Ú­Ì¬Ò¥i³B²z ±M®×´M¤H ¦æÂܺʱ± ¿ý­µÄá¼v ¨ä¥¦ºØºØ§xÂZ A8A8A

[uml-devel] remap_page_range

2005-03-17 Thread Tsillas, Demetrios J
I'm trying to simulate some hardware with a driver which maps a region of kernel memory (allocated with kmalloc) to user space. The user is called mmap which gives him direct access to some register space. This works well on a real Linux box but when I try to simulate the register region with

[uml-devel] (no subject)

2005-03-17 Thread andrea
--- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.

Re: [uml-devel] http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/ down?

2005-03-17 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 17 March 2005 16:53, itamar wrote: http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/ down ? Yes, just verified... the mirror below is still up, and seems up to date... http://uml.linode.com/blaisorblade/ Note I don't run the mirror (it's auto-synced periodically) and I don't manage

[uml-devel] uml help __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0)

2005-03-17 Thread itamar
I am running a uml machine, and I am getting this errors. __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0) __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x1d2/0) __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x1d2/0) __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x1d2/0) __alloc_pages:

Re: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] uml help __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0)

2005-03-17 Thread itamar
In the host I have 512 mb of ram I am running the guest kernel with mem=256M Itamar Reis Peixoto +55 (34) 3238 3845 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vps.ispbrasil.com.br I am running a uml machine, and I am getting this errors. __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0) __alloc_pages:

[uml-devel] Fwd: Re: 2.6.9/2.6.10 host local DoS due to ptrace.

2005-03-17 Thread Blaisorblade
The mail I'm forwarding describes a local DoS problem of 2.6.9/2.6.10, solved in 2.6.11 to my knowledge (and probably, before, in the -ac tree). I.e. the creation of unkillable processes due to a signal deadlock (not a race). So, I guess now that it's solved it's time to publicly disclose it...

Re: [uml-devel] [patch] Remove unnecessary config symbol from makefile.

2005-03-17 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 17 March 2005 08:19, Rob Landley wrote: There can be only one! Yes, but I prefer slightly the current way, since it's more similar to the obj-$(CONFIG_WHATEVER) += whatyouneed.o Kbuild idiom... Signed-off-by: Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -ur linux-2.6.11/arch/um/Kconfig

Re: [uml-devel] http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/ down?

2005-03-17 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Yes, just verified... the mirror below is still up, and seems up to date... http://uml.linode.com/blaisorblade/ Note I don't run the mirror (it's auto-synced periodically) and I don't manage the main host (only use the provided hosting). IIRC David Coulson hosts

[uml-devel] Can't compile under vanilla 2.6.11

2005-03-17 Thread Ian McDonald
Hi there, I've been watching the discussion around 2.6.11 and reading the archives and I can't find the information with any clarity that I need. My problem is that I can't get UML to compile. I can on 2.4.27 (with the standard patches) and with 2.6.10 also. My environment is Debian Woody with

Re: [uml-devel] Can't compile under vanilla 2.6.11

2005-03-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 17 March 2005 10:18 pm, Ian McDonald wrote: Hi there, I've been watching the discussion around 2.6.11 and reading the archives and I can't find the information with any clarity that I need. My problem is that I can't get UML to compile. I can on 2.4.27 (with the standard patches)

[uml-devel] ��� ��

2005-03-17 Thread ��
. , ? - http://podonki.irkutsk.ru/images/ni3042_0.jpg 3 . www.cardstaff.biz , . ,. . --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT

Re: [uml-devel] Can't compile under vanilla 2.6.11

2005-03-17 Thread Ian McDonald
I was doing all that you said here and without the typo for menuconfig that I put in... I am running x86 and gcc 2.95.4 - I am suspecting the gcc may be an issue but maybe I should also pull down the kernel from another mirror in case my mirror is not good that I am using... On Thu, 17 Mar 2005