Remember when I talked about making UML and its root filesystem be one file
you can just run? Well, I made one as a proof of concept...
http://www.landley.net/code/firmware/notes.html
You have been warned...
Rob
---
SF email is sponsored
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This trick is useless, because sys_ni.c will handle this problem by itself,
like it does even on UML for other syscalls.
Also, it does not provide the NFSD syscall when NFSD is compiled as a module,
which is a big
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This trick is useless, because sys_ni.c will handle this problem by itself,
like it does even on UML for other syscalls.
Also, it does not provide the NFSD syscall when NFSD is compiled as a module,
which is a big problem.
This should be merged currently in both
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 16:37, itamar wrote:
How to make a guest machine running more fast ?
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD_SYNC =Y or CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD_SYNC=N
The second is surely faster but less safe.
Whats the best for a uml provider ?
For recent (IIRC = 2.6.9, at least) the difference of
How to make a guest machine running more fast ?
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD_SYNC =Y or CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD_SYNC=N
Whats the best for a uml provider ?
Itamar Reis Peixoto
+55 (34) 3238 3845
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ispbrasil.com.br
---
SF
slick
--
Jason
When pigs fly, they fly first class.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Rob Landley wrote:
Remember when I talked about making UML and its root filesystem be one file
you can just run? Well, I made one as a proof of concept...
http://www.landley.net/code/firmware/notes.html
You have been
On Monday 11 April 2005 01:19, Ian McDonald wrote:
With this patch applied to 2.6.11.7 it is my first kernel that
compiles straight off :-)
Ok, that's the -bs tree, not the one I announced here (the -devel one) but
it's ok anyway.
It does not apply one patch because it is already applied which
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 06:05:43AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
Remember when I talked about making UML and its root filesystem be one file
you can just run? Well, I made one as a proof of concept...
http://www.landley.net/code/firmware/notes.html
Hehe, nice. I've been considering doing this
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-13 08:50 PST ---
If it's as quiet as the -stable tree and the patches are going upstream then I
might consider just merging it into gentoo-sources instead. Could you please
give me
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 11:27 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 06:05:43AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
Remember when I talked about making UML and its root filesystem be one
file you can just run? Well, I made one as a proof of concept...
Forgot to say that I have tested with 2.6.11.4 and -bs3, also
2.6.12-rc2. Also attempted 2.6.12-rc2 with development patch but this
won't compile at present as per earlier message.
On 14/04/05, Ian McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
In my continuing saga (which some are becoming
11 matches
Mail list logo
