Jeff == Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeff I'm sending this mail out to everyone that I can find who has had
Jeff the UML stubs compiled in unexpected ways, resulting in crashing.
Jeff I'd like testing of the patch below on as many gcc versions as
Jeff possible. I think
I don't know how to send sysrq through the stdio console.
I have a reproducable hang (well, I did this morning and think I can recreate
it). It's gcc 4.0.2 attempting to statically link busybox (the allyesconfig
version), it just goes off into la-la land. left it for an hour and no
progress,
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 22:00, Antoine Martin wrote:
Is NPTL supported and working? Are there separate patches to be
applied
against 2.6.10 kernel?
My current patchset, against 2.5.15-rc1, is running current Debian and
FC4
filesystems without any apparent problems.
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 05:20, Michael Richardson wrote:
Running a kernel which is not 2.6.15-rc2 (but a couple of merges back,
looking for a place where it works), I get:
If I try with mode=tt, (vs skas0) it boots, but on shutdown, I get:
I got it too, and actually I think it's
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:18:27AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
I want to add the int3 too - that's the only way to be deterministically
sure that GCC doesn't use %ebp after the unmap.
Well, my current patch branches to the int3. gcc will have to be pretty
imaginative to involve ebp in a
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:44:20PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
I've never used mconsole. Never needed it before.
Perhaps if I attach to a serial console instead of stdio I can send sysrq
that
way...
No. Just think a little. Banging on the SysRq key on your keyboard can't
do anything but
