Ok, this gives us a definite proposal, which I finally like:
* to exclude sys_tee:
bitmask = 0;
set_bit(__NR_tee, bitmask);
ptrace(PTRACE_SET_NOTRACE, bitmask);
* to trace only sys_tee:
bitmask = 0;
set_bit(__NR_tee, bitmask);
ptrace(PTRACE_SET_TRACEONLY, bitmask);
Semantics:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 01:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These patches are 2.6.17 material.
remove NULL checks and add some CodingStyle isn't.
Being restrictive is ok, but keeping patches in queues for longer than needed
creates more headaches than it solves,
Blaisorblade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless one considers
UML coding style to be a bug, which is an attractive idea ;)
Well, we're slowly working on that... very slowly... I've thought multiple
times to at least run Lindent on arch/um but I've not spoken up because of
all the
Hello Jeff, Paolo,
Sorry for the long mail, I hope it's not too boring ;)
I re-packaged (together with Stefano Melchior and Andreas Schuldei) the
user-mode-linux kernel[1] and uml-utilities[2] and I'd like to help with
the issues listed on u-m-l.sf.net pages related to Debian.
Firts of all: are
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:55:45PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
I re-packaged (together with Stefano Melchior and Andreas Schuldei) the
user-mode-linux kernel[1] and uml-utilities[2] and I'd like to help with
the issues listed on u-m-l.sf.net pages related to Debian.
Firts of all: are all
