Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] RFC allow PTRACE_SYSCALL to selectively skip syscalls

2006-05-21 Thread Steven James
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Friday 19 May 2006 16:09, Blaisorblade wrote: > > That is more or less my idea, however I've not had the time to work on it. > > Instead of changing the semantics we must add another option - I thought to > > use a ptrace option (the ones you set with P

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] RFC allow PTRACE_SYSCALL to selectively skip syscalls

2006-05-21 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 19 May 2006 16:09, Blaisorblade wrote: > That is more or less my idea, however I've not had the time to work on it. > Instead of changing the semantics we must add another option - I thought to > use a ptrace option (the ones you set with PTRACE_SETOPTIONS), Charles > Wright coded instead

Re: [uml-devel] debug uml

2006-05-21 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 18 May 2006 17:50, Nikola Knezevic wrote: > Hi all, > any solutions how to debug uml while it is booting? > I can trace You mean single-step? > it to process.c:start_userspace and a call to clone. After > that, I can't do anything, Ah, you can't trace the cloned process... or maybe