- Ursprüngliche Mail -
>
>
> > UML development mostly stopped in favor to KVM.
>
>
> so you mean to say that KVM is preferable to UML?
> (I Guess it may depend on the situation?)
KVM is *much* faster than UML and *much* less hacky. :-)
Thanks,
//richard
--
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Earlence Fernandes
wrote:
> But then there's a fundamental question of whether KVM has similar
> semantics.
KVM works completely different than UML does.
> UML was incredibly useful to my project since it ran a whole "kernel +
> processes" in user space.
> Now i'
But then there's a fundamental question of whether KVM has similar
semantics.
UML was incredibly useful to my project since it ran a whole "kernel +
processes" in user space.
Now i'm confused as to whether I need to change my work so that it works
with KVM (I'm trying to read thru KVM docs to under
>UML development mostly stopped in favor to KVM.
so you mean to say that KVM is preferable to UML?
(I Guess it may depend on the situation?)
-Earlence
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:17 PM, richard -rw- weinberger <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Earlence Fe
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Earlence Fernandes
wrote:
> The book (2004) states that work was going on for hardware assisted virt.
I don't think so.
> Has there been progress on it? Where do I find information on it?
> The UML source tree still comes with the original modes of operation.
UM
The book (2004) states that work was going on for hardware assisted virt.
Has there been progress on it? Where do I find information on it?
The UML source tree still comes with the original modes of operation.
-Earlence
--
