Comments inline
On 15/04/05, Blaisorblade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 14 April 2005 06:25, Ian McDonald wrote:
Hi there,
The problem is that my bootup dies very early on and this is the total
output: Checking for /proc/mm...not found
Checking PROT_EXEC mmap
Comments inline
On 15/04/05, Blaisorblade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 14 April 2005 06:25, Ian McDonald wrote:
Hi there,
In my continuing saga (which some are becoming familiar with) to get
UML 2.6.x working at all I have been given access to another machine
to develop
Forgot to say that I have tested with 2.6.11.4 and -bs3, also
2.6.12-rc2. Also attempted 2.6.12-rc2 with development patch but this
won't compile at present as per earlier message.
On 14/04/05, Ian McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
In my continuing saga (which some are becoming
With this patch applied to 2.6.11.7 it is my first kernel that
compiles straight off :-)
It does not apply one patch because it is already applied which is fine.
I did a quick test against 2.6.12-rc2 and it didn't like that at all
(many rejected patches). That is to be expected though as that is
And UML does compile under 2.6.11 with a patch for gcc (which is
include in 2.6.12-rc4). Haven't yet tried 2.6.12-rc1 but can do later
if this will help.
I'm confused: what?
That should read 2.6.12-rc2 not 2.6.12-rc4.
I will supply the .config when I get into university. I will try to
Comments inline
On Apr 7, 2005 7:36 AM, Blaisorblade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sed: -e expression #4, char 2: Extra characters after command
make[1]: *** [arch/um/kernel/config.c] Error 1
make: *** [arch/um/kernel] Error 2
and here is the file arch/um/kernel/.config.tmp.cmd that
OK after much further investigation, redownloading of source
(2.6.11.4) and looking at what you have said I know why it is
breaking
I had assumed (wrongly of course) that ARCH_SYSCALLS was a one line
symbol definition but it is much more than this.
The problem occurs because in both
Hi there,
I've been watching the discussion around 2.6.11 and reading the
archives and I can't find the information with any clarity that I
need. My problem is that I can't get UML to compile. I can on 2.4.27
(with the standard patches) and with 2.6.10 also.
My environment is Debian Woody with
22:40:54 -0500, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 17 March 2005 10:18 pm, Ian McDonald wrote:
Hi there,
I've been watching the discussion around 2.6.11 and reading the
archives and I can't find the information with any clarity that I
need. My problem is that I can't get
