On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
wrote:
> Can you please
> give me some directions? Shall I implement in the same manner as is
> implemented in
> /arch/x86/lib/delay.c . What are the big differences between this
> implementation and in an implementation
> for UML?
If you a
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:52 PM, richard -rw- weinberger <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
> wrote:
> >at an interval of some nanoseconds and to use the ndelay function. I
> saw
> > that in the kernel implementation
> >for the uml
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
wrote:
>at an interval of some nanoseconds and to use the ndelay function. I saw
> that in the kernel implementation
>for the uml there is no "delay_tsc"
>function and there is only the "delay_loop" function. I am wondering why
> the d
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:39 PM, richard -rw- weinberger <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
> wrote:
> > On an ubuntu kernel I used a busy waiting, with ndelay function which
> uses
> > the TSC register, but
> > I have noticed that this re
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
wrote:
> On an ubuntu kernel I used a busy waiting, with ndelay function which uses
> the TSC register, but
> I have noticed that this register cannot be read from an UML.
Please provide a test case.
--
Thanks,
//richard
-
