Re: [uml-devel] Testing requested - [PATCH] Fixing SKAS0 compilation problem / TT mode bug report

2005-12-02 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:18:27AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: I want to add the int3 too - that's the only way to be deterministically sure that GCC doesn't use %ebp after the unmap. Well, my current patch branches to the int3. gcc will have to be pretty imaginative to involve ebp in a

Re: [uml-devel] Testing requested - [PATCH] Fixing SKAS0 compilation problem / TT mode bug report

2005-11-29 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 28 November 2005 05:23, Jeff Dike wrote: On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:59:37PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: The attached patch is a (hacky) proposal, alternative to Jeff's fix-stub-syscall6, to fix the SKAS0 compilation problem. Bleah :-) Yep :-). In fact, Jeff's patch makes the

Re: [uml-devel] Testing requested - [PATCH] Fixing SKAS0 compilation problem / TT mode bug report

2005-11-29 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:28:56PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: So, again: can we finally rewrite clone.c in assembly? Or, otherwise, to use a unique assembly macro joining mmap, the return and trap_myself? I would favor the second, although I would just join the mmap and storing of the error