Re: [uml-devel] UML static linking and embedded library

2012-04-05 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:17:40AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Tuesday 03 April 2012 10:35 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: Solving the first issue is straight forward. For the second one I've to think a bit why Jeff took the current static linking approach. Expect patches for

[uml-devel] UML static linking and embedded library

2012-04-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Richard and others, I currently have 2 severity E(rrors) lintian rejects for the build I am preparing for Debian. The details for both the rejects are explained at: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath.html http://lintian.debian.org/tags/embedded-library.html

Re: [uml-devel] UML static linking and embedded library

2012-04-03 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org wrote: Hello Richard and others, I currently have 2 severity E(rrors) lintian rejects for the build I am preparing for Debian. The details for both the rejects are explained at:

Re: [uml-devel] UML static linking and embedded library

2012-04-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tuesday 03 April 2012 10:35 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: Solving the first issue is straight forward. For the second one I've to think a bit why Jeff took the current static linking approach. Expect patches for both issues in 3.5. :-) Thanks. Can you prepare the patch? We are