Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with libpthread.a

2017-06-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Florian, Am 29.06.2017 um 00:40 schrieb Florian Fainelli: >> Hehe, yes. >> This patch is good, I like it. :) >> It will part of the next pull request. > > Humm okay, did you apply the patch in one of your kernel trees on > git.kernel.org or somewhere else? Will happen soon since the merge

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with libpthread.a

2017-06-05 Thread Richard Weinberger
Florian, Am 05.06.2017 um 21:32 schrieb Florian Fainelli: > On 05/23/2017 05:32 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> Building a statically linked UML kernel on a Centos 6.9 host resulted in >> the following linking failure (GCC 4.4, glibc-2.12): >> >>

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with libpthread.a

2017-06-01 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 01.06.2017 um 22:15 schrieb Florian Fainelli: > On 06/01/2017 01:11 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Florian, >> >> Am 01.06.2017 um 21:38 schrieb Florian Fainelli: Presumably because we are not using the same glibc version? The one I have installed on this machine is glibc-2.12, do

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with libpthread.a

2017-06-01 Thread Richard Weinberger
Florian, Am 01.06.2017 um 21:38 schrieb Florian Fainelli: >> Presumably because we are not using the same glibc version? The one I >> have installed on this machine is glibc-2.12, do you want me to attach a >> copy of it? > > Richard, what do we do with this? I'd like to see the issues that

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with libpthread.a

2017-05-24 Thread Richard Weinberger
Florian, Am 24.05.2017 um 02:32 schrieb Florian Fainelli: > Building a statically linked UML kernel on a Centos 6.9 host resulted in > the following linking failure (GCC 4.4, glibc-2.12): > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.7/../../../../lib64/libpthread.a(libpthread.o): > In function