Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2] um: add dummy ioremap and iounmap functions

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On 21/06/17 03:30 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Since Arnd stays silent and um is the only remaining odd-ball, let's merge >> this >> in v4.13. > > Great! Thanks! Sorry for missing most of the discussion

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2] um: add dummy ioremap and iounmap functions

Am 08.06.2017 um 20:53 schrieb Logan Gunthorpe: > Any thoughts on this? My patches for the other architectures are already > in linux-next. um is the only one that remains. IMHO an ifdef in scatterlist code does not hurt. It is equally ugly than mocking ioremap for UML. So, I'm puzzled. Arnd,

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2] um: add dummy ioremap and iounmap functions

Hi Logan, On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > On 25/05/17 09:48 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Which ones are failing? >> I thought we killed the problem by making CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST depend on !UML. > > None, at the moment. My work is trying to add

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v2] um: add dummy ioremap and iounmap functions

Logan, Am 25.05.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Logan Gunthorpe: > The user mode architecture does not provide ioremap or iounmap, and > because of this, the arch won't build when the functions are used in some > core libraries. Which ones are failing? I thought we killed the problem by making