Re: [uml-devel] Triage on the pending patches

2005-03-06 Thread Rob Landley
On Saturday 05 March 2005 10:57 am, Blaisorblade wrote: Basically, my nefarious scheme is to add the squashfs patch to UML, append a squashfs image to the end of the UML executable, and have a cpio ramfs init script search through /proc/self/exe for the 32 bytes that were at the start of

Re: [uml-devel] Triage on the pending patches

2005-03-05 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 04 March 2005 03:11, Rob Landley wrote: On Thursday 03 March 2005 01:43 pm, Jeff Dike wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Well, just in case your job was too easy, here's one more. Using the quiet option shows a couple of lines being printed out by printf that should be printed

Re: [uml-devel] Triage on the pending patches

2005-03-03 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Well, just in case your job was too easy, here's one more. Using the quiet option shows a couple of lines being printed out by printf that should be printed out by printk (so they'll _shut_up_ when you ask it to). Those are printfs for a reason. Early boot mesages

Re: [uml-devel] Triage on the pending patches

2005-03-02 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 03 March 2005 03:22 am, Jeff Dike wrote: Since 2.6.11 is out, it's time to decide what patches go into mainline first. Here's my cut: Well, just in case your job was too easy, here's one more. Using the quiet option shows a couple of lines being printed out by printf that should