Hi Geert (et.al),
could you be so kind and give me a status update about your uml
framebuffer patch regarding kernel 2.6? UML in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 is the
first version since quite a while that works here. We use it to
prototype root file systems for our embedded Linux distributions like
OpenZaurus
Hi Geert (et.al),
could you be so kind and give me a status update about your uml
framebuffer patch regarding kernel 2.6? UML in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 is the
first version since quite a while that works here. We use it to
prototype root file systems for our embedded Linux distributions like
Blaisorblade wrote:
I've not seen any update to them from their original version (i.e. when they
were first discussed). Is this correct?
I guess, you're talking about my SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP patches. Since I created two
patches each for 2.6.9 and 2.6.7, you should have these four patches:
On Friday 28 January 2005 15:15, you wrote:
Hi,
Ok, now I get it... they're trying to workaround the fact that
modify_ldt() is not exported.
Thus they are probably violating the GPL
I am under the impression that it is permitted to distribute a binary
module, with only the loader
On Thursday 27 January 2005 03:22, D. Bahi wrote:
I would like a 2.4 that is stable. with a working hostfs.
Tried 2.4.27-bs1?
(that i can run valgrind against - heh, not umls fault here.)
I've never seen valgrind actually working against UML - Jeff Dike did some
work on Valgrind on this area
I am a final year student taking a degree in Computing at Dublin Institute of
Technology - Ireland. In my final year project I am doing a project using User
Mode Linux. My project has set out to research the capabilities of User
Mode Linux in a teaching environment. So far I have set up a server
Am Freitag, den 28.01.2005, 13:19 +0100 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
could you be so kind and give me a status update about your uml
framebuffer patch regarding kernel 2.6? UML in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 is the
first version since quite a while that
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 15:33, Alex LIU wrote:
Hi,Blaisorblade:
I have studied the TT mode of UML source code 2.6.7 for some time.But I
still can't work out the system call function flow in TT mode.I have read
some documents and comments on that but all of them are very rough...
Is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It's a huge work, but what is more important, it could obviously hurt
stability...
Yes.
So, I'd suggest to follow this policy to choose the work to merge:
- reduce *a lot* what is going to be merged... no new features, no
code cleanups (especially NOT the Makefiles
