[uml-devel] [patch 05/12] uml: extend cmd line limits

2005-03-22 Thread blaisorblade
From: Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Increase UML command line size. And fix a crash from passing an overly-long command line to UML. XXX: check that init can handle 128 params and 128 env. var. The

[uml-devel] [patch 07/12] Uml: little build fixes

2005-03-22 Thread blaisorblade
From: Al Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Vadim Abrossimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Easier parts from cross-build (or UML-kbuild) patch from Al Viro: *) abuses of host cc/ld/objcopy/paths are gone *) some #include path fixes *) other little abuses fixed *) remove LIBC_DIR var, ask gcc where libc.a is

[uml-devel] [patch 08/12] uml: factor out common code in user-obj handling

2005-03-22 Thread blaisorblade
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vadim Abrossimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] *) Handle USER_OBJS through the general Kbuild infrastructure; the trick we use is to change c_flags only for USER_OBJS. This ain't at all worse than the previous kludgy solution, enables us to use a

[uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml: fix cond. expr. as lvalues warning

2005-03-22 Thread blaisorblade
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gcc 3.4.3 (and probably any 3.4) emits some deprecation warnings currently about usages of CHOOSE_MODE, since the below syntax has been deprecated: (a ? foo: bar) = foobar; which often results from expansion of: CHOOSE_MODE(foo, bar) =

[uml-devel] [patch 11/12] uml: real fix for __gcov_init symbols

2005-03-22 Thread blaisorblade
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Anton Altaparmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Correctly export __gcov_init for cases where it's needed, by adding a weak definition for the case when GCC does not define this symbol and letting it being overriden by the real definition when GCC

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 03/12] uml: export getgid for hostfs

2005-03-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:21:23PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Export this symbol which is not satisfied currently. The code using it has been merged, so please export this symbol. and it's still bogus, and you haven't replied when I mentioned it last time.

Re: [uml-devel] Re: Testing GCOV handling in -bk

2005-03-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 21 March 2005 11:49, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 12:42 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: Anton, would you test the current -bk tree for the CONFIG_GCOV problem and the patch I and Jeff put together?

Re: [uml-devel] ptrace_test.c program on PPC

2005-03-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 20 March 2005 20:25, ashwin tanugula wrote: Hi, I know that UML has to be ported to PPC. I want to resume that work. I just wanted to make sure that my PPC box can run uml.(because the first step in porting uml is to check that the ptrace_test.c file outputs two same pids). Since

Re: [uml-devel] Hostfs permission checks are all wonky.

2005-03-22 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 02:19 pm, Blaisorblade wrote: On Sunday 20 March 2005 20:17, Rob Landley wrote: If I open a device like /dev/loop0 or /dev/console from a hostfs mount, I'll get the UML device, not the host device, right? Obviously right. So why are the permissions checks on