On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:35:55PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 08/17/2016 12:02 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> >> But let's ask Jeff first.
> >> Jeff, do you have a more recent SCM repo of uml-utilities?
> >
> > No, I don't believe so. Everything I have is out there somewhere.
>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:53:34AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:01:11PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
...
> > Mattia, do you volunteer? :-)
>
> Sure, sounds good to me.
For the record, I'll follow-up soon. I'm waiting for approval from my
employ
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:17:09AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:07:32AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 14.07.2016 um 05:08 schrieb M
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:07:32AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 14.07.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
> ...
> > > I can certainly help with that, since I would like to d
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.07.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
...
> > I can certainly help with that, since I would like to do that work
> > anyway in order to refresh the debian package. If you want to stuff
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:11:03PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Mattia Dongili <malat...@linux.it> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anybody knows if there is any newer version of the tools package
> > (the
Hi,
Does anybody knows if there is any newer version of the tools package
(the one with tunctl, uml_mount and friends)?
I'm maintaining[1] the package in Debian and I was wondering whether the
original code is hosted somewhere.
Thanks
--
mattia
:wq!
[1]: with varying degrees of consistency
. Maybe that
reason is no longer valid though...
---
commit ea13ff7608ea92df6ffa41e1124e5d3e6d7984fb
Author: Mattia Dongili malat...@linux.it
Date: Fri Apr 6 07:18:17 2012 +0900
Remove unnecessary RPATH definition
Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongili malat...@linux.it
diff --git a/arch/um
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:49:50AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 17:38 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
For user-mode Linux the other packages are not required. So
only build the package with the linux-image in it.
Cc: Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz
Cc: maximilian attems
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 04:27:31PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:49, richard -rw- weinberger
richard.weinber...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew, Linus, Jeff, ... anyone?
Please apply this patch.
CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is still broken. :(
I wanted to verify Tim's
;bug=494995
In short statically linking the uml kernel fails with the error below.
Any idea what may be wrong?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:36:19PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:36:49AM +0100, Graham Cobb wrote:
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 23:19:05 Mattia Dongili wrote
Hello again Jeff,
one more bug report on 2.6.26.2. It looks like .25 is affected as well
are both suffering from it.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:05:09AM +0100, Graham Cobb wrote:
Package: user-mode-linux
Version: 2.6.24-1um-1
Severity: normal
I use Debian lenny guest environment in UML to
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:54:26PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:44:20AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:20:22AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
it's not entirely clear to me why, but that patch fixes a segfault that
I experience when booting uml
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:44:20AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:20:22AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
it's not entirely clear to me why, but that patch fixes a segfault that
I experience when booting uml 2.6.25 built with gcc-4.3 on a 2.6.25
host (I also applied your
Hi,
first of all: do you really mean 2.6.8??
On Tue, January 9, 2007 10:55 am, pierrelaroche said:
These programs, as found in the Debian unstable tree, don't install
properly
on my Debian system. Apt-get insists on first removing all my kernel
images
claiming a conflict.
hmmm, maybe apt
On Thu, September 28, 2006 10:19 pm, Petter Reinholdtsen said:
[Mattia Dongili]
Well, I'd actually prefer if you could remove the noexec flag from
/dev/shm. I understand the security reasons given in the bugreport
but I'd prefer avoid having to deal with one more Debian-only (is
it?) thing
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:51:43PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:14:32PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
To make some writable tmpfs available to those in need of such system,
and to avoid using /dev
Thanks Petter for writing,
I was going to followup to the sysvinit bug :)
I'm Cc-ing upstream too.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:14:32PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Hi
I am one of the sysvinit maintainers. Recently we changed the mount
options of /dev/shm/, and got a bug report about
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:19:17PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Sunday 24 September 2006 13:46, Mattia Dongili wrote:
Hello Paolo,
with the following change the patch applies and hopefully works, still
building here but mm/fremap.o is done so I'm quite optimistic :) (__prot
is used
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:23:19PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:55:09PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
Does this mean that UML will run on a non-standard-vm-split _only_ if
the host has CONFIG_VMSPLIT_2G=y ?
The question is not clear. The host will only have
Hello UML developers,
I received the following bugreport for 2.6.16 UML running on a 2.6.16
host (both are debian packages). I found a similar report on a french
site[1], it seems to be the same problem.
Can you help putting some light there?
Thanks in advance
[1]:
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 04:12:08PM +0200, Stefano Melchior wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0200, Stefano Melchior wrote:
[...]
en_GB.UTF-8...BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
EIP: 0073:[40058d3f] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 007b:af86bd78 EFLAGS:
00200246
Not tainted
Hello Jeff, Paolo,
Sorry for the long mail, I hope it's not too boring ;)
I re-packaged (together with Stefano Melchior and Andreas Schuldei) the
user-mode-linux kernel[1] and uml-utilities[2] and I'd like to help with
the issues listed on u-m-l.sf.net pages related to Debian.
Firts of all: are
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:39:44AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Sunday 02 April 2006 21:54, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
Thanks for the patch, we'll possibly apply it, but we need to reimplement (or
copy and fix from glibc) a two-phase execvp(). I've not done it because I've
felt
The attached patch implements it and keeps backward compatibility.
It's kind of brutal because putenv will wipe any user-defined PATH, if
this is a problem I can provide an improved patch that appends
/usr/lib/uml to the existing PATH. Is this the way to go?
Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c 2006-04-02 16:32:38.340801686 +0200
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c 2006-04-02 16:34:13.454745936 +0200
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ struct
26 matches
Mail list logo
