Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:11 PDT ---
UML patch 2.6.12-bs5 also worked with usermode-sources-2.6.12
(that includes the gentoo patchset)
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:39 PDT ---
Yes, and -r1 should include -bs5 already... Bye
--
Configure bugmail:
On Thursday 14 July 2005 14:57, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 14 July 2005 03:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-09 15:41 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #52)
usermode-sources-2.6.12 is in portage. Please test it (see comment #51) as
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-06 02:57 PDT ---
usermode-sources-2.6.12 is in portage. Please test it (see comment #51) as it
should solve the NPTL
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 02:34, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 21:47, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggested tentatively:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 18:21, Nix wrote:
OK, so it's a -static TT build that's failing?
Exactly.
Built, with a randomly
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 19:38, Nix wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 21:47, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggested tentatively:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 18:21, Nix wrote:
OK, so it's a -static TT build that's failing?
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibbered uncontrollably:
Ok, I hope there is still somebody using UML on a NPTL-only system. The
workaround suggested last time was to avoid enabling CONFIG_MODE_TT; now I
think I've got over this problem, too. So, when I release 2.6.11.8-bs6 (which
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 16:31, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibbered uncontrollably:
Ok, I hope there is still somebody using UML on a NPTL-only system. The
workaround suggested last time was to avoid enabling CONFIG_MODE_TT; now
I think I've got over this problem, too.
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 17:54, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 16:31, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibbered uncontrollably:
Ok, I hope there is still somebody using UML on a NPTL-only system.
The workaround suggested
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibbered uncontrollably:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 17:54, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 16:31, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibbered uncontrollably:
Ok, I hope there is still somebody
Resending to list-only with less attachments:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 18:21, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibbered uncontrollably:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 17:54, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 16:31, Nix wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggested tentatively:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 18:21, Nix wrote:
OK, so it's a -static TT build that's failing?
Exactly.
Built, with a randomly selected .config (that is, a .config I use for
other things, not a .config with the values set at random!)
Not
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 21:47, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggested tentatively:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 18:21, Nix wrote:
OK, so it's a -static TT build that's failing?
Exactly.
Built, with a randomly selected .config (that is, a .config I use for
other things,
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-06 17:57 PDT ---
Ok, I hope there is still somebody using UML on a NPTL-only system. The
workaround suggested last
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-29 17:41 PST ---
Added 2.6.11-bs4 to portage under name usermode-sources-2.6.11 - thanks. I'd
appreciate it if someone could test it and let me know if it works, I'm not a
UML user
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-13 08:50 PST ---
If it's as quiet as the -stable tree and the patches are going upstream then I
might consider just merging it into gentoo-sources instead. Could you please
give me
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-08 11:01 PST ---
I'm maintaining some external patches for UML, as fix after release a bit
like the -stable tree, but for UML only.
What about adding it to portage? I can help if
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-19 12:54 PST ---
overhere the gentoo-source.11-r3 as host and gentoo-source.11-r4 as uml works
fine
what about a skas-patched-host-kernel? a use-flag for
On Thursday 10 February 2005 10:44 am, Blaisorblade wrote:
And requiring SKAS mode to use uclibc
uclibc doesn't allow static linking? It's strange...
Sorry, meant UML. (I have a cold.)
is roughly equivalent to requiring a
kernel module in order to work.
Ok, are you able to figure out
On Thursday 10 February 2005 09:33 pm, Blaisorblade wrote:
Sorry, meant UML.
(I have a cold.)
Best wishes for your health... (please, someone translate this to real
English :-) )
Oh, it's real english. (Or at least it seems so to someone who just burned
french toast to charcoal due to
On Friday 11 February 2005 03:42, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2005 09:33 pm, Blaisorblade wrote:
Gee, Red Hat, the distro that brought us gcc 2.96, is now having ld throw
assertion failures trying to build UML. It's nice to see tradition
maintained...
No, this one is Gentoo...
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 10:38 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 07:38 PST
--- Could someone please update me with the status of this bug? Are
there still problems?
I notice that the latest version in portage is based on
23 matches
Mail list logo
