On Thursday 27 January 2005 03:22, D. Bahi wrote:
I would like a 2.4 that is stable. with a working hostfs.
Tried 2.4.27-bs1?
(that i can run valgrind against - heh, not umls fault here.)
I've never seen valgrind actually working against UML - Jeff Dike did some
work on Valgrind on this area
+1
For my purposes I need solid, stable code. I prefer a a 2.4 and 2.6
kernel that builds without too many config gotchas. And runs reliably.
e.g. right now I am using the blaisorblade 2.6.9-bs patches and the
pre-hostfs 2.4 code. That works well.
I'm all for different UML trees/patches
I would like a 2.4 that is stable. with a working hostfs.
(that i can run valgrind against - heh, not umls fault here.)
Also, the uml web site needs to be authoritative. building
the above should not require patching from additional
sources announced on the list.
That said, 2.4 and 2.6 are both
