On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 03:25:41PM -0300, Alberto Bertogli wrote:
So I copied them from sysdeps/x86_64/jmpbuf-offsets.h, and building went
on. Probably, the same happens under i386.
The current patch for this is
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.17-rc4/patches/jmpbuf
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:40:48PM -0400, Steven James wrote:
The patch below for x86_64 implements a scheme where a ptraced system call
is skipped if the ptrace thread sets a return value (in RAX) when it
handles the syscall entry. Otherwise things proceed normally.
U, so where's the
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:23:19PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:55:09PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
Does this mean that UML will run on a non-standard-vm-split _only_ if
the host has CONFIG_VMSPLIT_2G=y ?
The question is not clear. The host will only have a
On Friday 12 May 2006 22:08, Mattia Dongili wrote:
Hello UML developers,
I received the following bugreport for 2.6.16 UML running on a 2.6.16
host (both are debian packages). I found a similar report on a french
site[1], it seems to be the same problem.
Can you help putting some light
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:09:39PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
More a bug. We are considering ways of detecting the host vmsplit at
run time and adapting to it, but added back the CONFIG_HOST_2G_2G as
an interim measure.
Thanks, will enable it in the .17 release of the debian package.
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:12:44PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:29:58PM -0300, Alberto Bertogli wrote:
Sure, here it is:
(gdb) disas stub_segv_handler
Sorry, I misread the error message and asked for the wrong thing.
Your UML is seeing a process segfault during a
