On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Gordon Russell drgruss...@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts?
FC15 x86_64 or x86_32?
Which host kernel are you using?
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
BlackBerryreg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San
2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64
My user mode linux kernels are all compiled statically on a fedora 32
bit machine.
Can I compile uml as a 64 bit executable instead? I keep thinking uml
must be compiled as a 32 bit executable...
Thanks.
Gordon.
On 4 August 2011 18:14, richard -rw- weinberger
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Gordon Russell drgruss...@gmail.com wrote:
2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64
My user mode linux kernels are all compiled statically on a fedora 32
bit machine.
Can I compile uml as a 64 bit executable instead? I keep thinking uml
must be compiled as a 32 bit executable...
Recompiled it on an up to date 64 bit fedora 15 machine. Thats much
easier, but unfortunately just the same error message when I run it.
Disabling SELINUX makes no difference btw.
Additional info:
/var/log/messages also contains:
kernel: [17259.970316] linux[14027] general protection ip:602a2e7f
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Gordon Russell drgruss...@gmail.com wrote:
Recompiled it on an up to date 64 bit fedora 15 machine. Thats much
easier, but unfortunately just the same error message when I run it.
Disabling SELINUX makes no difference btw.
Ok, I'll look at the issue.
First, I
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Gordon Russell drgruss...@gmail.com wrote:
Recompiled it on an up to date 64 bit fedora 15 machine. Thats much
easier, but unfortunately just the same error message when I run it.
Disabling SELINUX makes no difference btw.
On a FC15 LiveCD UML works fine.
Are
If you mean the default guest kernel config then no...
It is the default kernel config with extra stuff added to allow it to
run Fedora properly.
So additional things like cgroups, iptables, selinux, traffic
management, plus it is configured as a static build.
Plus modules are disabled (all
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Gordon Russell drgruss...@gmail.com wrote:
Did the livecd have 2.6.40-4 as the host kernel? It is just a feeling
but I thought it was working ok on my development server before I
rolled it out over the other servers, and originally fedora 15 as
installed was
Thanks for looking into this for me.
Ideally could you file the bug report? If they ask any followon
questions you will probably know the answer!
Let me know the bug number and I will put in me too if that will help.
I never worked out why fedora/redhat insists on patching the kernel
the way they
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Gordon Russell drgruss...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for looking into this for me.
Ideally could you file the bug report? If they ask any followon
questions you will probably know the answer!
Let me know the bug number and I will put in me too if that will help.
10 matches
Mail list logo
