On 2010-10-15 11:19, Tejun Heo wrote:
Commit f81f2f7c (ubd: drop unnecessary rq-sector manipulation)
dropped request-sector manipulation in preparation for global request
handling cleanup; unfortunately, it incorrectly assumed that the
updated sector wasn't being used.
ubd tries to issue as
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Tejun Heo hte...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can you please try this one then? It seems to work here but I can't
reproduce the original problem reliably so I'm not really sure.
Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
index
Commit f81f2f7c (ubd: drop unnecessary rq-sector manipulation)
dropped request-sector manipulation in preparation for global request
handling cleanup; unfortunately, it incorrectly assumed that the
updated sector wasn't being used.
ubd tries to issue as many requests as possible to io_thread.
Hello,
On 10/14/2010 04:20 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
It does not work for me.
But the error is a different one. :-)
Without your patch I've never got this kernel trace.
[ 59.85] kworker/0:1: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
Hmm... you're seeing out of memory
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:14:28PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Can you please try this one then? It seems to work here but I can't
reproduce the original problem reliably so I'm not really sure.
Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
index
Hello,
Can you please try this one then? It seems to work here but I can't
reproduce the original problem reliably so I'm not really sure.
Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
index 1bcd208..9734994 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
+++
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 10:02 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:44 AM, richard -rw- weinberger
richard.weinber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Arjan van de Ven
ar...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 10/14/2010 11:27 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 10:02 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:44 AM, richard -rw- weinberger
richard.weinber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Arjan van de Ven
Hello,
git bisect gave :
tfoer...@n22 ~/devel/linux-2.6 $ git bisect bad
365b18189789bfa1acd9939e6312b8a4b4577b28 is the first bad commit
commit 365b18189789bfa1acd9939e6312b8a4b4577b28
We use UML since 4 years on one host (P4). Now we build another UML-Host
on a Xeon and all was fine. A week ago we startet the third guest at the
Xeon Host and after some time the guest was killed from the host (see
the log at the end). It is allways the third startet guest. We stopped
all guest
On 10/14/2010 11:27 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
Hi Arjan!
This commit causes some problems on UML.
that is extremely weird.
The kernel freezes after a few seconds until it gets some input.
e.g: When I run top it stops refreshing the process list until i press a
button.
a slab
On 2010-10-15 11:19, Tejun Heo wrote:
Commit f81f2f7c (ubd: drop unnecessary rq-sector manipulation)
dropped request-sector manipulation in preparation for global request
handling cleanup; unfortunately, it incorrectly assumed that the
updated sector wasn't being used.
ubd tries to issue as
Hello,
Can you please try this one then? It seems to work here but I can't
reproduce the original problem reliably so I'm not really sure.
Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
index 1bcd208..9734994 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
+++
Hello,
On 10/14/2010 04:20 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
It does not work for me.
But the error is a different one. :-)
Without your patch I've never got this kernel trace.
[ 59.85] kworker/0:1: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
Hmm... you're seeing out of memory
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:44 AM, richard -rw- weinberger
richard.weinber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Arjan van de Ven ar...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
On 10/14/2010 11:27 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
Hi Arjan!
This commit causes some problems on UML.
that is
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:14:28PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Can you please try this one then? It seems to work here but I can't
reproduce the original problem reliably so I'm not really sure.
Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
index
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Tejun Heo hte...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can you please try this one then? It seems to work here but I can't
reproduce the original problem reliably so I'm not really sure.
Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
index
Commit f81f2f7c (ubd: drop unnecessary rq-sector manipulation)
dropped request-sector manipulation in preparation for global request
handling cleanup; unfortunately, it incorrectly assumed that the
updated sector wasn't being used.
ubd tries to issue as many requests as possible to io_thread.
18 matches
Mail list logo
