Re: Read gets stale data after failure of commit phase in CAS operation

thanks, Ryan > are you using one of the SERIAL Consistency Levels? yes, I use read with ConsistencyLevel.SERIAL. On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Ryan Svihla wrote: > are you using one of the SERIAL Consistency Levels? > > -- > Ryan Svihla > > On July 24, 2016 at 8:08:01

Read gets stale data after failure of commit phase in CAS operation

Hi, I have another question about CAS operation. Can a read get stale data after failure in commit phase? According to the following article, when a write fails in commit phase (a WriteTimeout with WriteType SIMPLE happens), a subsequent read will repair the uncommitted state and get the latest

Re: What is the merit of incremental backup

Hi Rajath, Thank you for your reply. But I'm not sure why the not compacted SSTables takes longer repair time. Could you explain the reason more detail? I guess that SSTables which backed up in backups directory will be never repaired so that It must exchange merkle tree and update actual data

Re: Read gets stale data after failure of commit phase in CAS operation

are you using one of the SERIAL Consistency Levels? -- Ryan Svihla On July 24, 2016 at 8:08:01 PM, Yuji Ito (y...@imagine-orb.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I have another question about CAS operation. > > Can a read get stale data after failure in commit phase? > > According to the following article,