Re: Injecting EJBs into Wicket

2009-04-01 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi David, Maarten! Maybe this is slightly offtopic: James Carman recently wrote a Wicket extension to generally use IOC containers to inject Beans (by name/type/type+name) called syringe [1]. This currently works for WebBeans (JSR-299, tested with OpenWebBeans) and Spring, but should be

Re: Geronimo 3.0 and CDI

2012-02-07 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! First a small hint: you don't need to use @Default explicitly because it's assumed if no other Qualifier (than @Named) is set. Second: you sure have the beans.xml marker files? Where is this class 'Injectable' exactly stored? A JAR in WEB-INF/lib, in WEB-INF/classes or an ear shared lib?

Re: Geronimo 3.0 and CDI

2012-02-07 Thread Mark Struberg
= false Btw, this BDA 'feature' is the reason for about 50% of all JBossAS, Weld and Glassfish bug reports in the CDI area ;) LieGrue, strub From: Adme Admirolas admiro...@gmail.com To: user@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Sent: Tuesday

Re: Geronimo 3.0 and CDI

2012-02-08 Thread Mark Struberg
From: Adme Admirolas admiro...@gmail.com To: user@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 3:13 PM Subject: Re: Geronimo 3.0 and CDI And what about EAR shared libs? Is there any potential problems? On 7 February 2012 15:49

Re: Geronimo Javamail wrong mail validation

2014-10-17 Thread Mark Struberg
hi amergey! Thanks for the report. @Hendrik are you fit in this area and like to probably take a look yourself? Of course I could help a bit but I'm not as good at javamail (didn't even look at the sources for a lng time). Maybe Romain might help you as well. Just check us out on IRC in

Re: Vulnerability issue with Apache geronimo jars in ActiveMQ Latest version.

2018-07-02 Thread Mark Struberg
Btw, which tool are you using to scan for security problems? We should report this to the tool vendor. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 02.07.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Ohh, that's really a false positive :( > > From the CVE-2011-5034: > >> Apache Ge

Re: Vulnerability issue with Apache geronimo jars in ActiveMQ Latest version.

2018-07-02 Thread Mark Struberg
Ohh, that's really a false positive :( From the CVE-2011-5034: > Apache Geronimo 2.2.1 and earlier computes hash values for form parameters > without restricting This only affects the Apache Geronimo Application Server - which is now retired btw. And there it affects HTTP post parameter

Re: Vulnerability issue with Apache geronimo jars in ActiveMQ Latest version.

2018-07-01 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi Munna! Do you have an example code? Classname, method and line number would really help! Not quite sure where there would be a hash collision. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 01.07.2018 um 14:13 schrieb Munna : > > Hi, > > We are using Apache-activemq-5.13 version.This version contains

Re: Expecting Stable versions of geronimo specs

2018-10-27 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi Vijay Those versions are perfectly usable. Of course it would have been better to use the 1.0 version but we didn't know back then if there were last minute changes in the specs. Now we know ;) LieGrue,strub On Thursday, 18 October 2018, 13:50:52 CEST, vijayaraghavan wrote: Hi

Re: OS

2019-04-18 Thread Mark Struberg
The Geronimo Application Server is generally End Of Life. The Apache Geronimo project nowadays focuses on providing reusable Enterprise Java components. hth. LieGrue, strub > Am 18.04.2019 um 03:39 schrieb liname...@outlook.com: > > Hello, I am doing an investigation. > Does Windows Server

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.25 release

2024-04-15 Thread Mark Struberg via user
+1 txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 15.04.2024 um 13:34 schrieb fpapon : > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache XBean 4.25 release to your vote. > > This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on > the release note): > > * Bug > - [XBEAN-343] - consistent handling of