Re: Details about the org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-json_1.1_spec:1.4 release?

[Eric Norman]

Oh, I see it now.  So this was an intermediate step in support of migration
to jakarta EE 9 then.

Apologies if this is covered somewhere that I could not find, but is there
a roadmap for how the upcoming jakarta EE 9 release will impact the
geronimo-spec-* projects going forward?  Will the geronimo-spec-* artifacts
be retired and everyone migrate to the equivalent artifacts from the
eclipse ee4j project instead?

Thanks and best regards,
-Eric

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 7:50 AM Raymond Auge 
wrote:

> So it appears the reason for the 1.4 release was to create a `jakarta`
> classifier [1].
>
> :)
>
> - Ray
>
> [1]
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-json_1.1_spec/1.4/geronimo-json_1.1_spec-1.4-jakarta.jar
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:23 PM Raymond Auge 
> wrote:
>
>> Actually, I don't think I did that release. I'll have to investigate in
>> source control to know for sure (is been a while ☺️).
>>
>> - Ray
>>
>> On Mon., Jul. 20, 2020, 7:57 p.m. Eric Norman, 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ray,
>>>
>>> I don't see any substantive changes to the manifest between version 1.3
>>> and 1.4.  The only differences I see in the manifest are the bundle version
>>> numbers.
>>>
>>> I've now compared the released source 1.3 and 1.4 jar files and the only
>>> difference is that the maven-shade-plugin was added to the pom.xml and the
>>> copyright year was updated in the NOTICE file.  But it doesn't appear that
>>> the maven-shade-plugin actually changed anything in the released binary
>>> file.
>>>
>>> Were you attempting to use the shade plugin to rename the javax.**
>>> packages to jakarta.** in the output jar file?  If so it doesn't look like
>>> it worked at all.
>>>
>>> Also, was I looking in the right place for the JIRA tracking of
>>> these geronimo-specs/** artifacts?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Eric
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:26 AM Raymond Auge 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 It's an update to the OSGi metadata I do believe. So the only change is
 in the manifest.mf.

 - Ray

 On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 16:27 Eric Norman,  wrote:

> I see that a 1.4 version of geronimo-json_1.1_spec appears to have
> been released on May 4, 2020.  Can anyone provide any details about what
> this release was about?
>
> The binary classes appear to be identical to the previously released
> 1.3 version of the same.  Also the JIRA version at [1] doesn't appear to
> have been marked as released yet with the details about what was fixed or
> changed in version 1.4.
>
> So I was wondering if this release was intentional and the 1.4 version
> should be used going forward or if something else has happened here?
>
> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO/versions/12346283
>
> I'd appreciate any guidance you can provide.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>

>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* 
>  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* 
>  (@Liferay)
>

Re: Details about the org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-json_1.1_spec:1.4 release?

[Raymond Auge]

So it appears the reason for the 1.4 release was to create a `jakarta`
classifier [1].

:)

- Ray

[1]
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-json_1.1_spec/1.4/geronimo-json_1.1_spec-1.4-jakarta.jar

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:23 PM Raymond Auge 
wrote:

> Actually, I don't think I did that release. I'll have to investigate in
> source control to know for sure (is been a while ☺️).
>
> - Ray
>
> On Mon., Jul. 20, 2020, 7:57 p.m. Eric Norman, 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ray,
>>
>> I don't see any substantive changes to the manifest between version 1.3
>> and 1.4.  The only differences I see in the manifest are the bundle version
>> numbers.
>>
>> I've now compared the released source 1.3 and 1.4 jar files and the only
>> difference is that the maven-shade-plugin was added to the pom.xml and the
>> copyright year was updated in the NOTICE file.  But it doesn't appear that
>> the maven-shade-plugin actually changed anything in the released binary
>> file.
>>
>> Were you attempting to use the shade plugin to rename the javax.**
>> packages to jakarta.** in the output jar file?  If so it doesn't look like
>> it worked at all.
>>
>> Also, was I looking in the right place for the JIRA tracking of
>> these geronimo-specs/** artifacts?
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:26 AM Raymond Auge 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It's an update to the OSGi metadata I do believe. So the only change is
>>> in the manifest.mf.
>>>
>>> - Ray
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 16:27 Eric Norman,  wrote:
>>>
 I see that a 1.4 version of geronimo-json_1.1_spec appears to have been
 released on May 4, 2020.  Can anyone provide any details about what this
 release was about?

 The binary classes appear to be identical to the previously released
 1.3 version of the same.  Also the JIRA version at [1] doesn't appear to
 have been marked as released yet with the details about what was fixed or
 changed in version 1.4.

 So I was wondering if this release was intentional and the 1.4 version
 should be used going forward or if something else has happened here?

 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO/versions/12346283

 I'd appreciate any guidance you can provide.

 Regards,
 Eric

>>>

-- 
*Raymond Augé* 
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* 
 (@Liferay)

Re: Details about the org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-json_1.1_spec:1.4 release?

[Raymond Auge]

Actually, I don't think I did that release. I'll have to investigate in
source control to know for sure (is been a while ☺️).

- Ray

On Mon., Jul. 20, 2020, 7:57 p.m. Eric Norman, 
wrote:

> Hi Ray,
>
> I don't see any substantive changes to the manifest between version 1.3
> and 1.4.  The only differences I see in the manifest are the bundle version
> numbers.
>
> I've now compared the released source 1.3 and 1.4 jar files and the only
> difference is that the maven-shade-plugin was added to the pom.xml and the
> copyright year was updated in the NOTICE file.  But it doesn't appear that
> the maven-shade-plugin actually changed anything in the released binary
> file.
>
> Were you attempting to use the shade plugin to rename the javax.**
> packages to jakarta.** in the output jar file?  If so it doesn't look like
> it worked at all.
>
> Also, was I looking in the right place for the JIRA tracking of
> these geronimo-specs/** artifacts?
>
> Regards,
> -Eric
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:26 AM Raymond Auge 
> wrote:
>
>> It's an update to the OSGi metadata I do believe. So the only change is
>> in the manifest.mf.
>>
>> - Ray
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 16:27 Eric Norman,  wrote:
>>
>>> I see that a 1.4 version of geronimo-json_1.1_spec appears to have been
>>> released on May 4, 2020.  Can anyone provide any details about what this
>>> release was about?
>>>
>>> The binary classes appear to be identical to the previously released 1.3
>>> version of the same.  Also the JIRA version at [1] doesn't appear to have
>>> been marked as released yet with the details about what was fixed or
>>> changed in version 1.4.
>>>
>>> So I was wondering if this release was intentional and the 1.4 version
>>> should be used going forward or if something else has happened here?
>>>
>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO/versions/12346283
>>>
>>> I'd appreciate any guidance you can provide.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Eric
>>>
>>

Re: Details about the org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-json_1.1_spec:1.4 release?

[Eric Norman]

Hi Ray,

I don't see any substantive changes to the manifest between version 1.3 and
1.4.  The only differences I see in the manifest are the bundle version
numbers.

I've now compared the released source 1.3 and 1.4 jar files and the only
difference is that the maven-shade-plugin was added to the pom.xml and the
copyright year was updated in the NOTICE file.  But it doesn't appear that
the maven-shade-plugin actually changed anything in the released binary
file.

Were you attempting to use the shade plugin to rename the javax.** packages
to jakarta.** in the output jar file?  If so it doesn't look like it worked
at all.

Also, was I looking in the right place for the JIRA tracking of
these geronimo-specs/** artifacts?

Regards,
-Eric





On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:26 AM Raymond Auge 
wrote:

> It's an update to the OSGi metadata I do believe. So the only change is in
> the manifest.mf.
>
> - Ray
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 16:27 Eric Norman,  wrote:
>
>> I see that a 1.4 version of geronimo-json_1.1_spec appears to have been
>> released on May 4, 2020.  Can anyone provide any details about what this
>> release was about?
>>
>> The binary classes appear to be identical to the previously released 1.3
>> version of the same.  Also the JIRA version at [1] doesn't appear to have
>> been marked as released yet with the details about what was fixed or
>> changed in version 1.4.
>>
>> So I was wondering if this release was intentional and the 1.4 version
>> should be used going forward or if something else has happened here?
>>
>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO/versions/12346283
>>
>> I'd appreciate any guidance you can provide.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eric
>>
>

Re: Details about the org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-json_1.1_spec:1.4 release?

[Raymond Auge]

It's an update to the OSGi metadata I do believe. So the only change is in
the manifest.mf.

- Ray

On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 16:27 Eric Norman,  wrote:

> I see that a 1.4 version of geronimo-json_1.1_spec appears to have been
> released on May 4, 2020.  Can anyone provide any details about what this
> release was about?
>
> The binary classes appear to be identical to the previously released 1.3
> version of the same.  Also the JIRA version at [1] doesn't appear to have
> been marked as released yet with the details about what was fixed or
> changed in version 1.4.
>
> So I was wondering if this release was intentional and the 1.4 version
> should be used going forward or if something else has happened here?
>
> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO/versions/12346283
>
> I'd appreciate any guidance you can provide.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>

Details about the org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-json_1.1_spec:1.4 release?

[Eric Norman]

I see that a 1.4 version of geronimo-json_1.1_spec appears to have been
released on May 4, 2020.  Can anyone provide any details about what this
release was about?

The binary classes appear to be identical to the previously released 1.3
version of the same.  Also the JIRA version at [1] doesn't appear to have
been marked as released yet with the details about what was fixed or
changed in version 1.4.

So I was wondering if this release was intentional and the 1.4 version
should be used going forward or if something else has happened here?

1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO/versions/12346283

I'd appreciate any guidance you can provide.

Regards,
Eric