Re: CSVDir pull connector challenge

On 24/01/2017 10:56, Martin van Es wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: So, you suggest I turn to Connid now for my functional issues with CSVDir? I would first clarify if there is something wrong ongoing (as suggested above), then

Re: CSVDir pull connector challenge

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: >> So, you suggest I turn to Connid now for my functional issues with CSVDir? > > > I would first clarify if there is something wrong ongoing (as suggested > above), then possibly report to ConnId. I was

Re: CSVDir pull connector challenge

On 23/01/2017 17:46, Martin van Es wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: but essentially, the "mandatory condition" can be specified both at Schema level (hence value(s) must be provided globally) or at mapping level (hence value(s) must be

Re: CSVDir pull connector challenge

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > but essentially, the "mandatory condition" can be specified both at Schema > level (hence value(s) must be provided globally) or at mapping level (hence > value(s) must be provided when provisioning to / from

Re: CSVDir pull connector challenge

On 23/01/2017 15:35, Martin van Es wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: I can't select target columns that are designated for key, status and delete by the connector. Is this by-design? I think it is somewhat by design, but I am not sure

Re: CSVDir pull connector challenge

On 23/01/2017 13:30, Martin van Es wrote: Hi, Finally, I've taken the time and went ahead (re)installing Syncope to try and play with 2.0. First: it's a nice improvement (on the admin interface). Well done! Thanks! :-) Also glad for your enduring interest in Apache Syncope. I've (re)