Hi,
Unfortunately, the attachment doesn’t go on the mailing list.
When you say cluster, you mean that you mix master/slave and NoB ?
Regards
JB
> Le 21 mai 2021 à 02:29, 梁坤红 a écrit :
>
> Hello!
> I have a ActiveMQ cluster with 3 nodes. Version are Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.9.
> The master node
Hello!
I have a ActiveMQ cluster with 3 nodes. Version are Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.9.
The master node failover 3 nodes due to unknowned reason. I attached the
activemq.log here.
Please help me to check the reason. your support is highly appreciated.
Waiting for your reponse sincerely!
peek at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/main/activemq-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/network/NetworkBridgeConfiguration.java#L308
when dynamicallyIncludedDestinations are configured, the set of
advisories that are subscribed to, will be restricted to just those.
On Thu, 20
Matt,
> Yep, sounds like the firewall constraint is going to nix the static network.
Very nice to get a confirmation on that, it takes away the remaining doubt.
> it sounds like your options are to look at implementing a series of bridges
That is exactly what we already started doing, and indeed
Yep, sounds like the firewall constraint is going to nix the static network.
If you must create connections in one-direction, it sounds like your options
are to look at implementing a series of bridges. Check out Camel. ActiveMQ
supports consuming from multiple queues and using wildcards, and
Matt,
> Have you considered a purely static network configuration?
Due to firewall constraints, we are forced to use "duplex" routing.
Static routing only seems to work one-way, thus it does not look useable to me.
e.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Matt Pavlovich
Verzonden: donderdag
Hi Erwin-
Have you considered a purely static network configuration?
-Matt Pavlovich
> On May 20, 2021, at 11:12 AM, Dondorp, Erwin wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> We are using ActiveMQ in a star-network of a few hundred remote brokers on
> small computers with a more beefy central broker(set).
>
Hello!
We are using ActiveMQ in a star-network of a few hundred remote brokers on
small computers with a more beefy central broker(set).
Functionally, this works fine.
Unfortunately, the network is not always stable (but this is exactly why we use
a messaging solution).
On network problems that
